RKG Logo 434-970-1010

The iPad launched just a little over two months ago with Steve Jobs heralding the device as a new “third category” between laptop computers and smartphones.  The less generous derided the iPad as little more than a giant iPod Touch.  For the online advertiser though, the key question is where user behavior places the iPad.

We’ve noted previously that, for the same ad, conversion rates tend to be significantly lower on mobile devices, even on top smartphones like the iPhone and those running the Android OS.  We offered several common sense explanations including that the relatively tiny screens of mobile phones are just too much of a barrier to completing a purchase.

Our data suggests iPad users behave much more like traditional desktop and laptop users than mobile users when it comes to online shopping:

For our largely retail clients, iPad traffic converted at 86% of the rate of desktop/laptop traffic in May 2010.  At the same time, even though Apple has sold over 2 million units to date, iPad traffic, for the time-being, remains dwarfed by traditional computers and mobile devices.

We’ve recommended parsing out mobile PPC traffic to allow for bid differentiation from better performing traffic before and Google has commendably made this a fairly simple process in their campaign settings:

Very shortly after the iPad debut, Google offered up the ability to specifically target the iPad.  I’m sure to Steve Jobs’ dismay, it is lumped with other top mobile devices rather than given a more venerated third classification, but the capability exists nonetheless.

Given conversion rates, it would clearly be a mistake to parse out the iPad with mobile devices as Google’s settings seem to favor.  Instead, iPad traffic is better grouped with traditional computer traffic.  Depending on your needs, it may make sense to parse out the iPad by itself, but current traffic levels probably don’t justify that quite yet.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

    No related posts.

Comments

  1. Linksphere SEO, June 9, 2010:

    I’m not too much into the PPC side of things myself and was wondering what your thoughts are on people using mobile devices (excluding iPad) to research a product on the train to work, note the price and website of a deal they like then logging onto their computer at work to make the actual purchase.

  2. Mark Ballard, June 10, 2010:

    Research is likely a big part of the mobile traffic we see. The problem is assigning a value to this traffic if we cannot accurately tie it to the order. I’ve seen a few analysts predicting mobile traffic will surpass desktop in just the next few years and, without a robust resolution to the attribution issue, this presents a real dilemma for PPC advertisers accustomed to a more precise view of their ads’ effectiveness.

Your Comment

Tags

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2010/06/08/ipad-users-shopping-like-traditional-computer-users/trackback/

Blogs Citing This Post

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention iPad Users Shopping Like Traditional Computer Users -- Topsy.com on June 8, 2010
  2. Pingback: Eagle River Webs » Blog Archive » iPad Users Shopping Like Traditional Computer Users on June 8, 2010
  3. Pingback: SearchCap: The Day In Search, June 8, 2010 on June 8, 2010
  4. Pingback: SearchCap: The Day In Search, June 8, 2010 | 123-sale.com Blogs on June 9, 2010
  5. Pingback: Mastering Email Marketing on June 9, 2010
  6. Pingback: Bloggers Digest June 2010 « Get Elastic Ecommerce Blog on June 30, 2010
  7. Pingback: Bloggers Digest June 2010 » Ecommerce Blog on June 30, 2010

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • George Michie: Thanks Adam, and your point is well taken. It is certainly worth pointing out that when the pendulum swings back to the middle the...
  • Adam Audette: Brilliant post, George. There’s something to be said for the ‘middle way’ to be sure, for dedication to what works...
  • George Michie: Billy, I’ve been predicting the death of Twitter for a long time. I try to keep those predictions to myself though, because I...
  • George Michie: Use the force, Luke, use the force! :-)
  • Siddharth Shah: Hi George, The paper chose books for a few reasons. This is what they say in the paper ” By focusing on books, we study a...
  • George Michie: Chad, thanks for the observations! Sid, the paper sounds interesting. I only read the abstract, but I wonder if they studied type of...
  • billy wolt: Hi George, this is the reason i have avoided twitter….the mob will move away soon. drop me an email, i want to pick your brain...
  • Siddharth Shah: Hi George, Your comment on retail reminded me of this paper I read a few months ago that investigated the online to offline...
  • Chad Summerhill: Hi George, sometime in my early 20’s I decided that if the mob was following something or doing something that I would be...
  • Chad Summerhill: No worries, I wouldn’t tell me either. But I’ve never been shy about asking smart people questions–has made a...
  • George Michie: Thanks Chad, I’ll answer these questions gladly…as soon as you come to work for us! :-) No question that the historical...
  • Chad Summerhill: Great post! Looks like I’ve got some work to do. Willing to share more about your bid-management predictive analytics?...
  • Chad Summerhill: Hi George, I would be honored. I’ll email you soon and we can talk about the details of the article. Thanks!
  • George Michie: Hi Chad, thanks for the link! If you’re willing to share the details I’d be delighted to do a feature at RKG Blog.
  • Chad Summerhill: Since I mentioned our in-house web analytics data warehouse earlier in the comments, I thought I would include a link to my new...

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 991
  • Words: 481,301
  • Comments: 3,360

Administration