RKG Logo 434-978-4300

My monthly article for Search Engine Land in case you missed it:

Q4 is ‘The Most Wonderful Time of the Year’ for many retailers, and managing paid search programs well through this period requires particular attention to detail.

Let’s take a look at some of the common trends we see in Q4 data and discuss how to, and how not to address these effects through anticipatory bid management.

We’ll use actual data from one of our client’s first Xmas with RKG to highlight some of the common phenomena. The first Xmas season is always challenging, because we don’t have data to use to help us anticipate the timing. As such, this data reveals some missed opportunities that we can model the next time around.

On each chart 100% means the average week between mid-September and mid-October. Lifts above or below reflect the week’s changes from that norm. We’re using “sales dollars” as a proxy for value because it is the most widely used. A better metric is margin dollars with frauds and cancels knocked out.

Newsflash: Sales go up at Xmas!

This happens for two reasons:

  1. Traffic volume increases. More people search, more people buy => higher PPC sales and advertising costs.
  2. Shopping behavior changes. Not only are there more consumers in the market, their propensity to buy and how much they buy fluctuates throughout the period.

It is this second factor that allows us to bid differently, and makes anticipatory bidding imperative. An increase in the volume of traffic by itself does not change the value of the traffic or what we can afford to pay for each click; it is the changes in the traffic’s value that allow for bidding adjustments.

So, yes traffic volumes spike:

But it’s the change in conversion rates and average order sizes that is interesting and actionable:

{There is undoubtedly social commentary to be made over the fact that AOV dips at gift giving season — we spend more on ourselves than on our loved ones? — but it’s also important to recognize that discounting leads to thinner margins which may in turn demand different efficiency targets.}

When we roll these phenomena together we get the true picture of changes to the traffic value over time.

If the goal is to maximize sales during the period at the same efficiency as normal then we should push/pull bids proportionally to the changes in traffic value. That way we maintain constant efficiency, and generate the most sales possible. {Folks who budget search instead look to spend the budget at the lowest Cost to sales ratio possible. This is a totally different problem, and, we think, the wrong approach to paid search.}

So, how did we do?

Not bad, given that we didn’t have good data to use to help us anticipate the changes. From this perspective it looks like we may have overspent just a titch the first two weeks in November, and may have underspent a bit the week of Xmas and the week after.

But hold on! This view ties the clicks and costs on a given day to the sales that happen that day. We know because of order latency that many of the orders placed today came from clicks on ads long before. This suggests we might have actually underspent during the ramp up and left opportunity on the table. So, let’s instead tie the orders to the time of the clicks that drove them and see what that reveals.

Well, it’s not an entirely different picture, but it is slightly different. By this view we were pretty much on target for those first two weeks in November, and it was the two weeks after that where we may have left a bit of opportunity on the table. Good to know! We’ll use these insights this year to do our jobs that much better.

Some folks out there will suggest that you should push the gas much harder early on to catch consumers in the “early phase of the consideration cycle”. I’ve heard folks say they’ll increase their cost to sales threshold by 50% or even 100% prior to the real increase in conversion rates, arguing that those “inefficient” weeks will appear very efficient when viewed by the orders those clicks seeded. I say: if the data from previous year supports that, go for it! But we haven’t seen shifts that dramatic, or anywhere close.

One other pitfall to avoid: Black Box bidding systems that don’t allow for anticipatory bidding. We see data that looks like what’s below every year from agencies that allow the algorithms to do it all, and every year the algorithm reacts too late during the ramp up and overspends greatly after the holiday ends.

These folks didn’t fish enough when the fish were biting, and fished too much when they weren’t. Overall, they may hit their efficiency targets, but they won’t end up with as many fish as they would have had with a smart analyst at the controls.

No two retailers will show the same trends, so let your data be your guide.

Here’s to a profitable Q4!

Technorati Tags: ,

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

Comments

  1. Lance, October 27, 2009:

    Brilliant article, George. It would be fascinating to do some predictive modeling based on increases in conversion rates as well at some point.

  2. George Michie, October 27, 2009:

    You are too kind, Lance.

    The modeling is particularly difficult for retail clients because the holidays don’t fall on the same days every year. The patterns look different for each retailer because of their market and their place within it, but to make matters worse, the patterns look different depending on whether Thanksgiving is early or late, the day of the week of Xmas, and how that influences shipping cut-off dates.

    There’s a great deal of art involved, too!

  3. Robert Phillips, November 11, 2009:

    Awesome post about PPC holiday bid management. It is very important to know and read article like this in order to manage bids in the season. I think you did lot of research and analysis to write this blog post. Anyway thanks for keeping me informed.

  4. George Michie, November 11, 2009:

    Thanks Robert.

    Pulling the data together is actually trivially easy for us. Indeed, storing the right data the right way is tremendously important for analysis purposes. If you don’t have the data, or don’t store it in ways that can be manipulated with great flexibility, then you’re prevented from doing the types of analyses which we think are crucial.

  5. Zach, December 14, 2009:

    I think keeping an eye on impression share during the holidays is important too. This time of year a lot of people are pulling out all the stops when it comes to how high they bid. I compared my impression share to conversions over the year and have seen a close correlation between the two. Over the last couple weeks I have had a decreasing impression share all of a sudden due to rank. I increased my bids and conversions went up, along with average CPC, but conversion rate went up due to the season.

  6. Billy Wolt, December 15, 2009:

    I love holiday time….not because everything increases, but because I know there will be a huge dropoff in competition in a couple of weeks.

    For some odd reason, it seems like all the big guys in the industry have advertising budgets. We spend as long as it’s profitable, and will spend more.

Your Comment

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2009/10/26/holiday-bid-management/trackback/

Blogs Citing This Post

  1. Trackback: uberVU - social comments on October 26, 2009
  2. Pingback: How to Evaluate Your AdWords Accounts | GROWMAP.COM on November 3, 2009

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Mark Ballard: Cory, I don’t see this as an SEO v. PPC issue. The core of my argument is that CTRs are lower primarily due to misleading...
  • Cory Grassell: What are your thoughts on stats that suggest consumers are more apt to click on organic search results than PPC results? As a...
  • George Michie: Kevin, Marc, thanks for your comments. Help is coming, but not the solution. There are a number of instances when the CTR on the...
  • Marc Adelman: George, You have been an advocate of “the advanced control option” for years now. Depressing right YEARS! Eh…listen...
  • Kevin Hill: Is what they really need is a fourth match type. Here’s google’s help documentation on broad match: This is the default...
  • Kevin Micalizzi, Dimdim Web Conferencing: Jim (& George)- We still offer a free version of Dimdim. Just click Sign Up Now at the top of the...
  • Tomas: indeed, i can’t talk about it either… :)
  • Philip Price: Thank you for the RegHack, it worked for me, tho at first when i made the reg file with the information i copied from above i also...
  • George Michie: Sorry Jim, this post was written in 2007. Apparently some of those products are gone.
  • Jim: Hey, I checked two products like dimdim and cutepdf but none is free. What are you talking about free and open source?
  • George Michie: If they keep hearing the same message, and seeing evidence in the data to back it up, something will have to give. There is hope on...
  • Tomas: I’ve been having the same argument with Google for months now and in the end there does seem to be a feature in the algorithm that...
  • George Michie: Doesn’t have to be, it can be intra-adgroup as well.
  • Josh: George – I take it you’re referencing a scenario where your exact-match keywords are not listed as negative exact match keywords...
  • George Michie: Melissa, you’re right, it’s always happened to varying degrees, particularly since the advent of extended broad match....

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 948
  • Words: 451,089
  • Comments: 2,877

Administration