RKG Logo 434-978-4300

If you see poor conversion on one engine, but the landing pages look good, products haven’t gone out of stock, and very tellingly: other engines have not experienced a similar dip in CR, here are two data dives that can be revealing:

1. Performance by Domain to see if there are domains that are bringing in poor traffic. (Ask.com is riddled with poor-performing syndicated partners.) I noticed that ave99 was bringing in a bunch of traffic on Yahoo for many of our client, with a few to no sales. (Here are a few other sites on Yahoo to watch out for: couponmountain.com, toseeka.com, shopica.com, findstuff.com, freedownloads.com, landing.trafficz.com, webmd.com, addictinggames.com, thefreedictionary.com)

Yahoo and Ask.com allow us to block domains on the search network. Google has yet to offer such an options in search.

One thing to keep in mind when chasing down the ‘problem’, Yahoo and Google discount CPCs based on partner site performance, so maybe this is already being taken into account through reduced CPCs on these sites. Because we are not able to see a line-item report of discounts, the trouble-maker domains getting a discount are a mystery. I dropped a few big stinker sites on Yahoo and actually saw an immediate dip in the cost/sales ratio, suggesting that these sites are not being discounted enough to justify letting the KWs serve on these sites.

2. Also, you can look at the Search Logs to see if the engine(s) are being too broad in their matching games. Are the engine serving a “flowers” ad for a search on “gift baskets”? This would be a problem because the landing pages (and copy) are not tailored to the actual search query. You want users to land on a page where the content matches the search intent. (It is best not to give users more options than they asked for, but also, not to show them only one or a few choices if they searched more broadly.) You can change matchtypes or add negatives to cut some of this poorly-matched traffic.

Tightening up the traffic will lift conversion, which means you can afford more per click on domains/keywords
that actually convert!

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

    No related posts.

Your Comment

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2009/10/01/conversion-rate-drop/trackback/

Blogs Citing This Post

  1. Pingback: SearchCap: The Day In Search, October 1, 2009 on October 1, 2009
  2. Pingback: SearchCap: The Day In Search, October 1, 2009 | GroupM Search.net on October 2, 2009

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • George Michie: Sorry Jim, this post was written in 2007. Apparently some of those products are gone.
  • Jim: Hey, I checked two products like dimdim and cutepdf but none is free. What are you talking about free and open source?
  • George Michie: If they keep hearing the same message, and seeing evidence in the data to back it up, something will have to give. There is hope on...
  • Tomas: I’ve been having the same argument with Google for months now and in the end there does seem to be a feature in the algorithm that...
  • George Michie: Doesn’t have to be, it can be intra-adgroup as well.
  • Josh: George – I take it you’re referencing a scenario where your exact-match keywords are not listed as negative exact match keywords...
  • George Michie: Melissa, you’re right, it’s always happened to varying degrees, particularly since the advent of extended broad match....
  • Mel66: I don’t think this is a bug. It’s been happening for years. It *is* impossible to manage, and I can’t help but wonder if...
  • George Michie: Thanks Matt, Sometimes humor serves a purpose.
  • George Michie: Ken, sadly, as Jim stated above, too few people look under the hood and raise Cain. We’re very fortunate to have great reps on...
  • Matt: This is great! I started out reading this with the same anger that I feel everyday I spend unnecessary amounts of time optimizing to get...
  • Ken Truman: Right on, George. This is yet another one of the vagaries of broad matching that continues to drive smart advertisers mad. Your post...
  • George Michie: Interesting idea, Mark. The question might be: would advertisers know someone’s Twitter handle? Most require an email, but I...
  • @markthijssen: What if you would ask a consumer about his experience with the product some days/weeks/months after the sale via twitter. This might...
  • George Michie: Thanks Kenny, Another particularly annoying variation on the theme involves flashing the brand ads around on general searches. The...

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 948
  • Words: 451,089
  • Comments: 2,867

Administration