RKG Logo 434-978-4300

It’s official, MSN and Yahoo have worked out a deal by which the Bing platform will become the core for both natural and paid listings on both networks.

Search Engine Land has a good write-up outlining the arrangement.

Our take? This is a good thing for PPC on three fronts:

  1. The Yahoo service reps stay on using the MSN platform. This takes the best of both worlds. Yahoo’s reps have always been top drawer in our experience and the Bing API interface is excellent — it would be great if they didn’t update the API every time there is a .net update, and if they didn’t force ordering on XML which should be stateless, but…
  2. By combining traffic, the Bing and Yahoo data sets will be far more robust allowing data-driven firms to work more of their magic. Heck demographic targeting might actually become valuable when there is enough data to model.
  3. Reducing redundancy won’t hurt. Having to launch promotional copy across three engines takes time. Dropping from 3 to 2 will reduce grunt work and allow our analysts more time to focus on higher value analysis.

None of this will happen over night. They expect to close the deal in early 2010 after careful sniffing by regulators, and “full implementation” may take 24 months.

Will “Ya-Bing!” pose a real threat to Google? We’ll see. Looking just at Paid Search, the share is still only 20%. Google is still hugely dominant. But it certainly gives Microsoft a fighting chance. Now, if they can just pry AOL away from Google…

Technorati Tags: ,

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

    No related posts.

Comments

  1. sri, July 29, 2009:

    Wow! Finally Microsoft has reached a deal Yahoo for an internet search partnership. Will the newly announced deal between giants Microsoft and Yahoo be a good thing? Got to wait and see. But atleast Microsoft and Yahoo deal is straightforward and not complex at all and ofcourse, the negotiation talks have been going for long. I was just curious to know all the past negotiations between Microsoft and Yahoo so collected all the articles and links (more than 200) related to the current merger and the previous events or negotiations between Microsoft and Yahoo. If you are interested check the link below.
    http://markthispage.blogspot.com/2009/07/saga-of-microsoft-and-yahoo-from-2007.html

  2. Chris1, July 29, 2009:

    I’m shocked that anyone would consider Yahoo’s service reps “top drawer”! A few years back, we were a platinum advertiser (or something like that) at Yahoo – a team from Yahoo even flew out to Boston to meet with us. Now, we have no rep support at all. We spend $600-$800/day on PPC with Yahoo, and when I have a problem, all I can do is email the general support box.

    I have 4+ people I can go to at Google, 3 at MS and even 2 at Miva, but no rep at all at Yahoo. If this deal means I lose my MS reps and still get no support from Yahoo, then I vote for no deal!

  3. George Michie, July 29, 2009:

    Fascinating perspective, Chris. Thanks for sharing.

    We can only speak to our own experiences with the agency teams. Our Yahoo folks have always been excellent and responsive. Our new MSN folks are a HUGE improvement over the past and we’re quite pleased with them, too, but that’s a big change from where they were.

    Of course, we manage $100 million annually in advertising, so we probably get better service than most.

Your Comment

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2009/07/29/msn-and-yahoo/trackback/

Blogs Citing This Post

  1. Pingback: Why I’m Torn on the Bing Yahoo! Deal - SeoAlchemist - How to make gold with SEO. on July 31, 2009
  2. Pingback: Why I’m Torn on the Bing Yahoo! Deal on November 3, 2009

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • George Michie: Sorry Jim, this post was written in 2007. Apparently some of those products are gone.
  • Jim: Hey, I checked two products like dimdim and cutepdf but none is free. What are you talking about free and open source?
  • George Michie: If they keep hearing the same message, and seeing evidence in the data to back it up, something will have to give. There is hope on...
  • Tomas: I’ve been having the same argument with Google for months now and in the end there does seem to be a feature in the algorithm that...
  • George Michie: Doesn’t have to be, it can be intra-adgroup as well.
  • Josh: George – I take it you’re referencing a scenario where your exact-match keywords are not listed as negative exact match keywords...
  • George Michie: Melissa, you’re right, it’s always happened to varying degrees, particularly since the advent of extended broad match....
  • Mel66: I don’t think this is a bug. It’s been happening for years. It *is* impossible to manage, and I can’t help but wonder if...
  • George Michie: Thanks Matt, Sometimes humor serves a purpose.
  • George Michie: Ken, sadly, as Jim stated above, too few people look under the hood and raise Cain. We’re very fortunate to have great reps on...
  • Matt: This is great! I started out reading this with the same anger that I feel everyday I spend unnecessary amounts of time optimizing to get...
  • Ken Truman: Right on, George. This is yet another one of the vagaries of broad matching that continues to drive smart advertisers mad. Your post...
  • George Michie: Interesting idea, Mark. The question might be: would advertisers know someone’s Twitter handle? Most require an email, but I...
  • @markthijssen: What if you would ask a consumer about his experience with the product some days/weeks/months after the sale via twitter. This might...
  • George Michie: Thanks Kenny, Another particularly annoying variation on the theme involves flashing the brand ads around on general searches. The...

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 948
  • Words: 451,089
  • Comments: 2,867

Administration