RKG Logo 434-978-4300

Sometimes I get irate when I see what some PPC agencies say, and indeed what they do with their clients’ accounts. In my tirades I’ve often posed the question:

“Do these folks really not understand how search works, or are they criminal enterprises that steal from their clients through lies and deception?”

However, Alan always encouraged me to “be nicer” to people and I’m trying hard to follow that advice.

There’s another explanation for poorly run campaigns that is probably both more charitable and more accurate at least in some cases: many agencies view their role differently than RKG does. Namely, they view themselves as advertising brokers.

In many respects this is the traditional relationship between advertising agencies and their clients. The agency provides creative guidance, expertise and ideas, and often negotiates placements with publishers (Print, TV, Radio, etc.). Their compensation is based on how much media they buy for their clients, with the notion that successful campaigns will be broadcast widely, lead to more ads and more media buys. The markup charged by agencies (15 – 20% of ad spend) creates incentive to develop campaigns that are a hit, and also to sell their client as much advertisement as they’re willing to buy.

As a retailer, I certainly worked with agencies that facilitated advertising, but they called themselves brokerages. We worked with List brokers, Print Ad brokers, and Package Insert/ Alternative Media brokers. We were willing to pay them their mark up to keep us from having to manage the logistics internally. However, we always knew that they weren’t really on “our side” of the table. It was a three sided table, the advertiser, the broker, and the publisher, each with their own interests. We knew that the broker would push us to buy more than made sense to us, that was their job, just as every home buyer should realize that “their” real estate agent actually works for the seller.

When Alan and I started RKG we chose a different model. We wanted our management fees to be based on the amount and quality of our work, and our relationships with our clients to be more in the vein of a partnership. We wanted to be viewed as part of their marketing team, paid fairly for our work but ultimately working as advocates for our clients’ interests.

We did accept convention in establishing a fee structure based on advertising spend, but we put caps on both the maximum and the minimum monthly fee to keep the fees in line with the amount of work we do. We didn’t invent Christmas, and while big programs do tend to require more from us than small programs, they shouldn’t scale off the charts.

Funny that from this perspective those other agencies don’t look evil, or incompetent, they just look like brokerages. Maybe my complaint with them is in not being more transparent in that regard.

As an advertiser, how do you know whether your PPC agency is more like a broker or more like your advocate?

The fee structure is one piece. Fees that scale off the charts don’t make sense in PPC. Companies that can spend lots of money cost effectively on PPC can do so primarily because of market conditions, not because of any particular brilliance of their agency. If there is a ton of search for your products, you have competitive offerings and the space is full of competition, the search volume and CPCs will create a big program whether it’s well managed or not. Revenue-sharing arrangements are no better, and are usually worse when commissions are paid for search on your trademarks.

The other tell-tale signs might come from how you answer 4 questions:

  1. Have they ever suggested reducing spend?
  2. Have they ever suggested not trying a new program or strategy pushed by the engines that would require you to spend more money?
  3. Have they ever resisted your suggestions to spend more on the grounds that their experience suggests it would be ineffective?
  4. Do they frequently push you to advertise more aggressively than makes sense to you?

No PPC agency will call themselves a brokerage, but asking the questions above of their clients might help you get the straight scoop.

Technorati Tags: , ,

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

No Comments Yet

Your comment will be first!

Your Comment

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2009/07/22/ad-brokers-or-client-advocates/trackback/

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Mark Ballard: Cory, I don’t see this as an SEO v. PPC issue. The core of my argument is that CTRs are lower primarily due to misleading...
  • Cory Grassell: What are your thoughts on stats that suggest consumers are more apt to click on organic search results than PPC results? As a...
  • George Michie: Kevin, Marc, thanks for your comments. Help is coming, but not the solution. There are a number of instances when the CTR on the...
  • Marc Adelman: George, You have been an advocate of “the advanced control option” for years now. Depressing right YEARS! Eh…listen...
  • Kevin Hill: Is what they really need is a fourth match type. Here’s google’s help documentation on broad match: This is the default...
  • Kevin Micalizzi, Dimdim Web Conferencing: Jim (& George)- We still offer a free version of Dimdim. Just click Sign Up Now at the top of the...
  • Tomas: indeed, i can’t talk about it either… :)
  • Philip Price: Thank you for the RegHack, it worked for me, tho at first when i made the reg file with the information i copied from above i also...
  • George Michie: Sorry Jim, this post was written in 2007. Apparently some of those products are gone.
  • Jim: Hey, I checked two products like dimdim and cutepdf but none is free. What are you talking about free and open source?
  • George Michie: If they keep hearing the same message, and seeing evidence in the data to back it up, something will have to give. There is hope on...
  • Tomas: I’ve been having the same argument with Google for months now and in the end there does seem to be a feature in the algorithm that...
  • George Michie: Doesn’t have to be, it can be intra-adgroup as well.
  • Josh: George – I take it you’re referencing a scenario where your exact-match keywords are not listed as negative exact match keywords...
  • George Michie: Melissa, you’re right, it’s always happened to varying degrees, particularly since the advent of extended broad match....

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 948
  • Words: 451,089
  • Comments: 2,877

Administration