RKG Logo 434-978-4300

We hope Bing grows its base and becomes a major contender in the PPC Landscape. Competition is good; domination is bad. From the get go, we’ve been doubtful that an advertising blitz, even on the scale MSN is contemplating, will make users switch engines.

Looking at the initial launch, and the hoopla surrounding it, it would be easy to suggest that there has been some movement.

Looking at the week before and the four weeks subsequent to its launch, one could conclude that Bing did gain a share of impressions initially, and that led to a greater share of click more recently — signs of hope!

However, when one steps away from the microscope and looks at the longer term trends, the last four weeks “trends” appear to be more like random statistical noise.

The media blitz has just begun, I know, but until these numbers change meaningfully, I hope everyone will pardon us for turning our attention back to the other 95% of the game.

Technorati Tags: ,

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

Comments

  1. Marc Adelman, June 30, 2009:

    George,

    Thanks for sharing this data. From an online buzz perspective, Bing is making a big splash. Everyone is talking about it. Will it grow to rival Google – uh, I would be shocked? Google ain’t broke – and insane marketing spend alone won’t take users away from what they have overwhelmingly chosen as their search engine of choice.

    On the online marketing front though – Bing is still the same red headed step child as Live Search….MSN…whatever the name might be today. Yes, they have changed more than just the name – but they still represent 5% or so of the search market and therefore 5% of the total potential revenue for any company involved in search engine marketing.

  2. Guy P, July 8, 2009:

    I predict Bing will continue to gain direct market share from Google.

    Googlge being Google has again decided to run their spam filter test during the summer and wiped out a lot of good websites thus angering many webmasters. Not to mention, depending on whay you search for, Google results are pure trash right now and Bing results are much better.

    In the past, Google could do that because what alternative did searchers have, then even Google worst results were better than the competitors best results.

    This time, that is not the case and people have noticed in a big way. The very people who by word of mouth made Google what it is and now that Google has turned a blind eye to the webmasters, Bing is going to get a lot more attention.

    I’ve been a Google supporter since they started and I’ve switched and don’t miss Google at all and in fact find Bing a much more pleasant search experience.

  3. George Michie, July 9, 2009:

    Thanks for your comments, gentlemen.

    I always believed that Google was vulnerable to the extent that it’s just an algorithm. If someone figured out a better mechanism for determining what people want when they type “X” into a search window users would migrate quickly.

    I haven’t spent enough time on Bing to determine whether it provides a better experience for me. To Marc’s point, I haven’t had any problem finding what I want from Google, so I haven’t needed to look for something better. That may be the barrier Bing faces. If Google is “fine” and people are used to it, those habits can be hard to break.

Your Comment

Tags

RKG Tags: ,

Technorati Tags: ,

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2009/06/30/bing-market-share/trackback/

Blogs Citing This Post

  1. Pingback: Bing Click Share Update on September 10, 2009

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • George Michie: Kevin, Marc, thanks for your comments. Help is coming, but not the solution. There are a number of instances when the CTR on the...
  • Marc Adelman: George, You have been an advocate of “the advanced control option” for years now. Depressing right YEARS! Eh…listen...
  • Kevin Hill: Is what they really need is a fourth match type. Here’s google’s help documentation on broad match: This is the default...
  • Kevin Micalizzi, Dimdim Web Conferencing: Jim (& George)- We still offer a free version of Dimdim. Just click Sign Up Now at the top of the...
  • Tomas: indeed, i can’t talk about it either… :)
  • Philip Price: Thank you for the RegHack, it worked for me, tho at first when i made the reg file with the information i copied from above i also...
  • George Michie: Sorry Jim, this post was written in 2007. Apparently some of those products are gone.
  • Jim: Hey, I checked two products like dimdim and cutepdf but none is free. What are you talking about free and open source?
  • George Michie: If they keep hearing the same message, and seeing evidence in the data to back it up, something will have to give. There is hope on...
  • Tomas: I’ve been having the same argument with Google for months now and in the end there does seem to be a feature in the algorithm that...
  • George Michie: Doesn’t have to be, it can be intra-adgroup as well.
  • Josh: George – I take it you’re referencing a scenario where your exact-match keywords are not listed as negative exact match keywords...
  • George Michie: Melissa, you’re right, it’s always happened to varying degrees, particularly since the advent of extended broad match....
  • Mel66: I don’t think this is a bug. It’s been happening for years. It *is* impossible to manage, and I can’t help but wonder if...
  • George Michie: Thanks Matt, Sometimes humor serves a purpose.

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 948
  • Words: 451,089
  • Comments: 2,875

Administration