| Title: | Google PlusBox Performance Results |
| URL: | http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2009/05/12/google-plusbox-results/ |
| Printed: | March 12, 2010 |
| Source: | The Rimm-Kaufman Group Blog, info@rimmkaufman.com |
- May 12, 2009
- 10 comments
Back in Late October I discussed my early thoughts on the flashy, new Google AdWords’ PlusBox product (while it was still in Alpha stages). Now, with a little over 6 months of data, I wanted to share my early impressions of the product’s performance.
(Sample Google PlusBox Ad; Before and After Expansion)
1) Google has gradually increased their PlusBox “show rate” among eligible AdWords campaigns. Over the 6 month time frame, we’ve seen this rate increase from 38% to a more recent mark of around 70-75%.
2) PlusBox “expansion rate”, users who actually expanded (clicked) on the PlusBox component of the ad once shown, is 0.5% or about 1/10th the standard ad’s CTR, (sans PlusBox).
3) The overall CTR of ads containing PlusBox, click-through on headline or PlusBox offer component, had a slightly better rate as compared to the standard ad.
4) Of users that expanded the PlusBox, 1 in 15 actually clicked on an offer (product) to follow through to the site. Furthermore, of those clicking the PlusBox only 1 in 7 actually made it to the advertiser’s site. (by virtue of headline or product listing)
5) The CR of users who did follow through to the site once expanding the PlusBox was on par with the standard ad.
Here’s how I view the above;
A final thought:
If Google’s intent for PlusBox was to give the user a quick glance at a number of retailers product offerings without leaving Google.com, I believe this product could lead to a minor loss in order volume for the advertiser due to the pre-click “abandonment rate” phenomenon. If however this negative attribute is offset by increased interaction with the ad, both Google and the advertiser win (This is true to what I’ve seen so far). The success of PlusBox then, has little to do with the expansion of products within the ad itself, and is mostly a result of the CTR boost by merit of having a PlusBox next to your ad, while other advertisers do not.
If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.
Related Posts
- Google AdWords Plusbox Revisited New Google AdWords Plusbox Functionality, SERP Layout & Notable Data Updates...
- Google Now Displaying SKUs in Paid Results Helpful or harmful to users and advertisers?...
Comments
Your Comment
Trackback
http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2009/05/12/google-plusbox-results/trackback/Blogs Citing This Post
- Pingback: links for 2009-05-19 | bg Theory, LLC on May 19, 2009
- Pingback: Google Adwords PlusBox | Google Adwords Blog on May 20, 2009
- Pingback: SearchCap: The Day In Search, May 12, 2009 « Seo Costa Rica on May 24, 2009
- Pingback: Google AdWords Plusbox Revisited on October 8, 2009
- Pingback: Neue Möglichkeiten bei Adwords-Anzeigen » Sitelinks, Google, Anzeigen, Plusbox, Produkte, Prof » Blog für den Onlinehandel on February 24, 2010
Matt,
Thanks for the data on this.
It appears that the only clear advantage of the plus box at this point is an increase of CTR when your ad is the only ad on the page that has the plus box. Therefore it seems like the plus box is serving as a function of visual differentiation and is influencing the subliminal click decision process more then speaking to it’s ability to display products and provide the Google user with a more rich and targeted user experience.
If we fast forward 2 years, to the point when 50% or > of the Paid results may have a plus box, will this positive factor be negated by a level visual playing field?
Google needs to have the plus box be more tightly connected to an Adwords process rather then a base feed process. While the potential for greater Google search user interaction is increased with the plus box, the lack of targeting and relevance to the individual search query, makes this increased potential more of a wash.
Spot on, Marc!
50%+ might wash out the CTR benefit, (perhaps) visually clutter the page, and if product listings continue to be lackluster, users will stop using them!
Google - For long-term product viability….We need more controls!
I’ve talked with a few retailers that would love to have the ability to specify 3 top products for PlusBox on a given keyword. I doubt Newegg is happy about the 3 products Google chose to display from the Google Base feed. Perhaps adding a Product Ranking column to the Base feed would allow the advertiser to educate Google’s tools about key skus to promote. This rank alongside the taxonomy and product description might be the first step to improving PlusBox product listings.
Advertisers having control would be great.
Ultimately I think this product will go the way of click-to-call. Google is trying to dynamically determine what products will resonate for a given search. I have much more faith in the advertiser, their merchants, their internal search page logic, etc to figure this out. Users will quickly learn to blow off the plus box suggested products in favor of the advertiser’s landing page.
The idea that consumers will do all their shopping without ever leaving Google.com is Google’s white whale — beware what you pursue!
What if the plus box was fed by extra fields in the Adwords upload file?
Plus Destination URL 1
Plus Image 1
Plus Destination URL 2
Plus Image 2
Plus Destination URL 3
Plus Image 3
This would allow the plus box to be controlled within adwords on all levels. Additionally it would become a kind of landing page testing function that could be controlled on an individual adgroup level.
The customer on Google would see images and links that the advertiser selected to show for that query.
That would be much more interesting, I think. If someone searched for Canon cameras the plus box expansion might have sub-category pages for Canon digital, canon film cameras, and canon lenses perhaps.
Whatever the search, you’d essentially feed them top choices for the next level of detail that might interest them, not try to guess the sku.
I LIKE it!