RKG Logo 434-970-1010

No PPC agency is right for every advertiser.

Andrew Goodman’s recent SEL Post dividing the world of PPC practitioners into “Muddy Ones” and “Quants” was quite entertaining and accurately characterizes most firms in the space. We at RKG like to think of ourselves as “Muddy Quants” in Andrew’s vernacular. Alan has the PhD in Stats, and…well…I’m muddy.

We believe that for large, competitive, ROI driven accounts you must have both pieces. You need an advanced system to predicatively model data and execute bid changes automatically, because hand-bidding off of spreadsheets simply doesn’t compete in 2009. At the same time, we know enough about numbers to recognize the limitations of the data and the need for human ‘intervention’ and control of the process. The predictive model has no way of knowing that there’s a sale next week on Gibson Guitars or anticipating how that might impact performance; it has no way of knowing that you’re out of Merrill boots sizes 9-11; or that a retailer has just gotten some co-op advertising dollars from Kohler; or that customers of certain types of products are much more likely to pick up the phone and call or visit the local store than the average spillover rate would suggest. Marketing is muddy, no matter how skilled one is at analysis.

But not every advertiser is both ROI driven and competing a large, complex marketplace.

How does your company think about advertising/marketing? Is the primary goal of PPC advertising to:

  1. Create positive awareness of your brand?
  2. or

  3. Generate maximum revenue within some acceptable ROI?

Many will answer “both”, but in our experience only one of these dominates an advertiser’s thought process.

Agencies come with the same biases: either they’re fundamentally direct marketers and live and die by ROI calculations; or, they’re advertising agencies that focus on share of voice, brand awareness and creating positive experiences with your brand.

If the principal objective is branding, you don’t need the mathematicians/engineers, and likely you don’t want them. When you ask “What sort of ‘outside the box’ ideas do you have for creating brand awareness?” the quants will scratch their heads and send you a spreadsheet pointing out why the changes you suggest would damage conversion rates, lowering revenue per click forcing bids down the page. Not what you wanted to hear, and, frankly you’re asking number crunchers to paint a portrait.

If, like our clients, you enjoy talking about hold-out tests, the incrementality of a marketing program, lifts necessary for offers to pay-off, and the cannibalization that occurs between different marketing programs, you will be miserable if you hire the advertising agency style of PPC firm. They will talk about metrics that don’t matter to you like impression share, they will talk about buying cycles without supporting data, and most importantly the results will stink. At a gathering of agency heads I heard one say “(egads) Our clients are starting to ask us to separate brand from non-brand performance data, and (horror of horrors) some are even asking for keyword level performance data!?!” I almost fainted! (As Direct Marketers, RKG has been providing that data to clients since our inception, and indeed encouraging them to think through the consequences of overspending for branding purposes.)

Agencies often claim expertise in both, but take a look at their “about us” page to see their roots. The roots will determine the type of tree. Those who aren’t direct marketers by training do not build the right analytical systems, the data warehouses, or the algorithms and don’t train their staff to eat, breath and sleep ROI.

Advanced data modeling doesn’t help every company that seeks ROI.

Data modeling requires data. If an advertiser’s niche is too narrow in scope or geography, the best mathematicians in the world won’t be able to materially outperform the advertiser’s own staff. An agency of muddy-ones will do every bit as well as the muddy-quants like RKG, and probably better than the algo-only firms.

Finding the right PPC agency for your firm requires knowing yourself and whether your organization sees PPC as primarily an advertising vehicle, or primarily a direct marketing vehicle, and finding an agency that shares the same view.

Technorati Tags: ,

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

    • Can Agencies be Rated? The Forrester rankings are clearly meaningless. However, we couldn't really rank our competitors either....

Comments

  1. Rachelle King, May 12, 2009:

    This is funny – I have run across this article today in 2 different places. OK I will then post twice because it deserves double kudos :o)

    Great article! It is so very true for a company to be satisfied with PPC performance for them to find a match between their business goals & the agencies talents. You have given solid advice on how to find those agencies that can stand the test of “proof”. Being able to build actionable reports to increase different online goals is key, & if an agency doesn’t understand what is important to the business for it’s success then it can not build good campaigns little lone reports to help the company grow.

    I think there are agencies that can do both awareness & direct “action” marketing through PPC however also finding those that won’t abuse the “Brand” to show high ROI is another thing to be aware of. I like that you point out companies are getting more involved in the results & are asking to see data even at the keyword level! Coolo! Finding a balance between brand campaigns & CPA campaigns in PPC is an art, & unique to the business goals. Love this article! Thanks :o)

  2. George Michie, May 13, 2009:

    Thanks Rachelle,

    You’re certainly right that agencies can and must support multiple client objectives. A number of our clients who are primarily direct marketers will nevertheless set aside some money for branding. They might, for example, tell us to push certain keywords beyond their efficiency targets simply for the brand value.

    My point is not that agencies are incapable of multitasking, but more that each agency has a core competency and a primary area of comfort. Traditional ad agencies can do direct marketing, they just don’t do it very well because it’s not what they like to do so they don’t put tons of thought and energy into how to do it right.

    The converse is also true, if you’re interested in creative ideas for landing page design that would convey your brand to visitors unfamiliar with your company I’m certainly the wrong guy to ask! If you want to do MVT testing on several different pages to find what converts best, I’m interested and useful, but creative? not my thing. :-)

  3. atul chatterjee, May 21, 2009:

    Lots of commonsense hidden within the lines. A company should stick to its core competencies, but now the number of competencies are rising. PPC did not exist before 2003. Companies will have to increase multi-tasking abilities.

Your Comment

Tags

RKG Tags: ,

Technorati Tags: ,

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2009/05/11/ppc-direct-marketing-or-branding/trackback/

Blogs Citing This Post

  1. Pingback: Twitted by ronnypassarge on May 12, 2009
  2. Pingback: Twitter Trackbacks for PPC Agencies: The Roots Determine the Tree [rimmkaufman.com] on Topsy.com on September 2, 2009

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • George Michie: Art, your observations about negatives are very interesting. Hopeful the selection bias will get people to read before they click,...
  • George Michie: John E., thanks for stopping by! You make an excellent point over as SEL, but I think what will happen is a positive selection bias....
  • John: I too am concerned about the long tail effect. Users are going to have to “wade” through competing websites to find anything...
  • John Ellis: As a paid search marketer, I am little concerned about the long-tail effect. Hopefully, I am wrong. FYI – See my thoughts here:...
  • Jc: Yeah when you’re talking about Google, they already have a large set of randomly sampled statistics on user behavior from their tests...
  • Art: Here are some observations I have so far. 1. Example: In my daycare campaign I have “jobs” as a negative phrase match keyword. When I do a...
  • George Michie: Dale, it will be fascinating to see how this plays out. I have to believe that it won’t result in a greater propensity for...
  • George Michie: Another interesting possibility: If users no longer scroll, but “just keep typing” does that mean that the click volume...
  • Dale Stokdyk: For me, it’s hard to believe the 3 second rule is enough — in my gut, I suspect impressions will increase. Also, I...
  • George Michie: Great point, JC, They made the comment during the press conference that they think* users will conduct more searches around the...
  • Jc: I think it will be very interesting what will happen to impressions and CTR. Based on the assumption that whatever Google does increases their...
  • George Michie: Dale it’s a great question. I wonder what fraction of searches actually happen from Google.com vs toolbars vs an iGoogle...
  • Dale Stokdyk: George, I use the Google Search Bar 99% of the time — I wonder about others? Was fascinating to watch the search results change...
  • George Michie: :-) Somewhat less so…Yahoo?…don̵ 7;t get me started :-)
  • Jc: Now my question is, do you share the same level of faith about Bing? Haha.

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 993
  • Words: 481,930
  • Comments: 3,390

Administration