RKG Logo 434-978-4300

Dan Shipe of Adwords Marketing Tool raised an interesting specter on our blog the other day: could Google’s geo-targeting ultimately hurt the national websites? Might regional ads take precedence to the point that the national ads lose their golden goose?

The answer to this question will boil down to user intent, the perceived value of the ads to brick and mortar retailers, and their ability to manage a search program.

Let’s tackle these one-at-a-time.

  • User Intent: When searching for “leather ottoman” what fraction of users are interested in buying one online vs conducting research for an offline purchase? Of the latter group, are users interested in checking what’s available locally, or are they just kicking tires and want to see the broadest selection possible? The answer to these two questions will be a major determinant of who wins the tug-of-war. How much an advertiser can afford to spend on an ad depends on the value of the traffic, and the value of the traffic is largely a function of user intent. If most of the users want to see the national selection and want to buy online, the national retailers will win the bidding wars because value suggests they can pay more.
  • Perceived Value of the Ads: Above, we talked about the value of traffic. For the national website, this is fairly easily measured. For the local retailer, not so. Not only is tracking the real value nearly impossible; the local merchant isn’t likely to think in terms of direct marketing. Their principle vehicles for advertising (circulars, print ads, radio, local TV) aren’t trackable to begin with so much of their ad buying tends to be a blend of art, science and instinct. While the true value of the advertising matters; equally important is the perceived value in the mind of the brick and mortar manager. They could conceivably buy up the impressions ‘irrationally’ as some online retailers did in the first years of search and so starve the national players.
  • Ability to Act: What may ultimately save the national websites is the economy of scale. For REI to lose impressions materially on a keyword like “hiking boots”, five or six local brick and mortar retailers would have to outbid them — in every locale. Here in Charlottesville, only one local ad is on the first page and it’s actually a geo-targeted ad from a national retailer. While national chains could muster the marketing horsepower to produce targeted, comprehensive keyword lists relevant to each store with smart bidding to manage the economics, small regional chains and one-off stores won’t have the bandwidth to pull this off, I don’t think.
  • Conceivably, in the major markets, a critical mass of local retailers could find enough value in geo-targeted search to make a go of it, but I get the sense that we’re still a long way from seeing that happen.

    I’d love to hear other people’s take on this!

    George

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

Comments

  1. Jason Anderson, October 1, 2008:

    Interesting Post.

    Seems likely that the same forces that produce a mix of regional and national advertising on television will impact SEM and online marketing generally. In search, the local/national mix will manifest itself in a wider variety of ways due to the millions of query “channels”.

    As SEM players become more involved in exotic (read: non-ROI based, and too some degree unknowable) value calculations that George describes, we’ll see an even more familiar blend of local and national advertising in the SEM space.

  2. George Michie, October 1, 2008:

    Thanks for your thoughts, Jason.

    I like your metaphor of the millions of query “channels”. Indeed it may be that poor converting (for the online retailer) general search terms are the very ones local retailers are most interested in. Those general searches may convert poorly because they tend to be brick and mortar consumers kicking tires. Following that logic the local retailer could spend more on that traffic than the super-targeted tail terms used by online shoppers with credit cards in hand. Both constituencies “win” and Google wins BIG :-)

  3. dan shipe, October 7, 2008:

    Hey, me again.

    What about possible exploits to this system? Adwords must evaluate the geographic region based on the IP address of the landing page, and the IP of the consumer. Could an advertiser setup multiple websites, each hosted in various geographic regions, in the hopes of boosting his quality score? Or could you spoof IP addresses to take advantage of the geo-targeting?

  4. George Michie, October 7, 2008:

    Hi Dan,

    The IP address of the advertiser isn’t a factor, anyone can run geo-targeted ads regardless of where their website resides. Indeed, we find some incremental benefit in running geo-targeted ads and national ads for some of our clients, particularly when they are better known in some regions of the country than others. We find they can afford to spend more per click in friendly areas than in areas where they aren’t well known.

Your Comment

Tags

RKG Tags:

Technorati Tags:

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2008/09/29/local-search/trackback/

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Nancy Kast: J.C. Penney –I am writing about your billing and online services. I have been receiving calls saying my bill is not paid. My...
  • Marc Adelman: George, Thanks for sharing this data. From an online buzz perspective, Bing is making a big splash. Everyone is talking about it....
  • George Michie: Hi Dennis, I’m not a lawyer, so take anything I say on this with a grain of salt (and please don’t sue us if we’re...
  • survey online: unfortunatelly i have to say that Google tools are the easiest survey web
  • Dennis Yu: Alan, We’ve had several C&D’s sent to us for seemingly innocuous issues. One of our casual dining clients bid on a...
  • George Michie: Hi Vivek, Haven’t had time to put together a full update, but I did take a look at the numbers. No material gains in market...
  • Karridy: You should checkout ClickPath’s call to KW tracking.
  • Vivek: George, really enjoying reading about the analysis you guys do. Was wondering if you have an update on this given a couple more weeks have...
  • Vicki Swaim: Dear Mr.Ullman, I hope you can help me with my problem. I ordered a TV stand the end of April that was advertised as a close out item....
  • Luke: It’s a shame we live in such a litigious society. Why should we have to set up an association? Surely we can prevent senseless...
  • George Michie: Josh, we have had shots fired over our bow and our client’s in the past. Usually responsible companies are reasonable about...
  • Ryan: Ok, George, I’m sufficiently scared… Thanks… :-) Incidentally, are there any trademark resources (other than Google...
  • Josh: We have run into trademark issues for several clients, although it has so far been a matter of trying to make “fair use” of a...
  • Mike: THANK YOU! I love you man!! :)
  • Matthew: Francis, We’ve likewise seen the “A-List” phenomenon in the past. Perhaps with Bing.com, there won’t be anymore of...

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 871
  • Words: 392,916
  • Comments: 2,079

Administration