RKG Logo 434-978-4300

In case you missed it, this was posted yesterday on the Search Marketing Blog Searchengineland

Taking advantage of intraday fluctuations in traffic value can be important to maximizing the efficiency of your PPC ad spend. We see statistically significant variances in traffic value on the order of 5% to 25% for many retailers, and much more than that for some.

However, measuring and acting on these value differences requires careful thought and proper execution. Below are 9 Keys to taking advantage of intraday value variations:

  • Value, not volume: As you do the research make sure you’re looking at the quality not the quantity of traffic. The fact that more traffic is available at certain times during the week doesn’t mean you can afford to pay more for it. Ideally you should analyze margin dollars per click as a function of day of week and time of day. Sales per click or conversion rates (orders per click) may be acceptable proxies for value.

  • Analyze the right traffic: You want to study the value of the non-brand PPC traffic coming into your site isolated from all other traffic. Direct load and brand traffic behave very differently than competitive PPC traffic, and since the latter is all your PPC program controls that’s what you need to study. Also, make sure your click times and order times are from the same time zones!
  • Credit sales appropriately: Remember your cookie windows! Many of the conversions, hence much of the value comes long after the click. It is a mistake to divide the PPC margin that flows in from, say, 9AM - 10 AM Monday morning by the clicks that came in during that period. For most retailers half of the orders placed during that period were driven by clicks that happened more than a day earlier. The proper way to do this is to credit the value to the time of the click that got the credit.
  • Balance data volume and data recency: You’ll need to pull in data over a period of weeks to smooth out statistical noise and have enough data to parse usefully. How many weeks? This is tricky and depends on your business. Usually 6 to 12 weeks makes sense, but the farther back you go the less relevant the data is to today, particularly if your product offerings are seasonal and/or your clientelle varies by season. Go back too far and there is trouble, too little and you may not have enough data to act upon rationally.
  • Carve out the exceptions: Understand that sale events and holidays can totally wash out the normal time of day and day of week dependencies. Exclude data from these periods from your analysis so that “Black Friday” doesn’t get your systems too excited about the average Friday. Also, as these events approach, think about suspending your dayparting rules to avoid zigging when you should be zagging.
  • Don’t slice too thin: It’s tempting to try to gild this lily by parsing the data more finely than you really can. Each time-bucket should have at least 100 conversions to have a true sense of the traffic’s value. It may sound cool to say that your system tweaks the bids 24 hours a day 7 days a week associated with day-parting. Very few advertisers have enough data to accurately assess traffic value in 168 buckets without going so far back in time that the data may be irrelevant.
  • Creative bucketing: One strategy for addressing sparse data is to assume independence of time of day and day of week. It’s not a great assumption, but from our experience it’s not a bad approximation of the truth. What it means is you can calculate the day of week effect, parsing data into 7 buckets, and separately calculate a time of day effect parsing data into 24, or 12, or 8 buckets, and then overlay those effects. This assumption allows you to get much closer to the truth with much less data than you’d need to treat the variables as dependent. Also, there’s no reason for the buckets to all be the same size. You might, for example, parse by the hour during peak traffic, but glom the “wee hours” of the morning all together.
  • Execution: Make sure the bid changes are actually pushed out to the engines when they should be. This is not trivial. For most systems there is latency between calculation of bids and implementation of them. Make sure you understand that latency and factor it into your process.
  • Wade in, don’t dive in: Bear in mind, we don’t see all the value we’re driving. People search at home at night and then buy on their work machine’s T1 line. The tracking is on the home machine which didn’t place the order, so the day-parting analysis may think nights are worse than they are. There can be similar impacts on the weekends. There are times during the week when people are more likely to pick up the phone and call an 800 number after getting to a website, which again can make evening and/or weekends look artificially depressed. We recommend ramping up the day-parting factors slowly and watching for “surprising” effects.

Day-parting should not be first and foremost on the minds of SEM managers. Building comprehensive and smart keyword lists tied to the right landing pages, and having a robust, smart bidding system are far more important in the great scheme of things. But when your program is ready to go beyond blocking and tackling, following these keys can generate incremental top line within your efficiency needs.

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

Comments

  1. Andrew Holladay, September 2, 2008:

    Good Stuff. I did a research paper a while back that visually lays out a number of these points in heat map form people may find helpful. download the pdf here..

    http://www.andrewholladay.com/biddingtimezones.pdf

  2. George Michie, September 2, 2008:

    Thanks Andrew,

    Heat maps are cool! Looks like careful thought went into this, thanks for sharing!

    George

  3. Breakline Marketing, September 21, 2008:

    Excellent refresher. We don’t look at Day Parting enough here.

    Best,

    Breakline

Your Comment

Tags

RKG Tags:

Technorati Tags:

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2008/09/02/day-parting/trackback/

Blogs Citing This Post

  1. Pingback: E-researching » Blog Archive » SearchCap: The Day In Search, September 2, 2008 on September 2, 2008
  2. Pingback: SearchCap: The Day In Search, September 2, 2008 - SeoAlchemist - How to make gold with SEO. on September 2, 2008
  3. Pingback: searchenginemarketingvox » Blog Archive » SearchCap: The Day In Search, September 2, 2008 on September 2, 2008
  4. Pingback: Search Engine Optimization » Blog Archive » SearchCap: The Day In Search, September 2, 2008 on September 3, 2008
  5. Pingback: houseofseo.com » Blog Archive SearchCap: The Day In Search, September 2, 2008 on September 20, 2008
  6. Pingback: Reader’s Choice: Best Articles About Paid Search on November 21, 2008
  7. Pingback: Keep Day-Parting Up to Date on March 23, 2009

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Nancy Kast: J.C. Penney –I am writing about your billing and online services. I have been receiving calls saying my bill is not paid. My...
  • Marc Adelman: George, Thanks for sharing this data. From an online buzz perspective, Bing is making a big splash. Everyone is talking about it....
  • George Michie: Hi Dennis, I’m not a lawyer, so take anything I say on this with a grain of salt (and please don’t sue us if we’re...
  • survey online: unfortunatelly i have to say that Google tools are the easiest survey web
  • Dennis Yu: Alan, We’ve had several C&D’s sent to us for seemingly innocuous issues. One of our casual dining clients bid on a...
  • George Michie: Hi Vivek, Haven’t had time to put together a full update, but I did take a look at the numbers. No material gains in market...
  • Karridy: You should checkout ClickPath’s call to KW tracking.
  • Vivek: George, really enjoying reading about the analysis you guys do. Was wondering if you have an update on this given a couple more weeks have...
  • Vicki Swaim: Dear Mr.Ullman, I hope you can help me with my problem. I ordered a TV stand the end of April that was advertised as a close out item....
  • Luke: It’s a shame we live in such a litigious society. Why should we have to set up an association? Surely we can prevent senseless...
  • George Michie: Josh, we have had shots fired over our bow and our client’s in the past. Usually responsible companies are reasonable about...
  • Ryan: Ok, George, I’m sufficiently scared… Thanks… :-) Incidentally, are there any trademark resources (other than Google...
  • Josh: We have run into trademark issues for several clients, although it has so far been a matter of trying to make “fair use” of a...
  • Mike: THANK YOU! I love you man!! :)
  • Matthew: Francis, We’ve likewise seen the “A-List” phenomenon in the past. Perhaps with Bing.com, there won’t be anymore of...

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 871
  • Words: 392,916
  • Comments: 2,079

Administration