RKG Logo 434-978-4300

If you spend an unusual amount of time evaluating, testing and just plain using websites, at the end of a long day, almost anything can seem like a interface conundrum. On the way home from work, I stop by the store for milk and veggies. As I swipe my card, I raise an eyebrow when I reach for the display: “Hmm…should those buttons be laid out “Cancel/OK” or “OK / Cancel.” Dunno. But I need the milk and veggies, so I just pay and go home.

Because I really do consider that particular interface question for at least a moment nearly every time I swipe my card, I smiled when I saw that Cancel/OK Vs. OK/ Cancel is the subject of Jakob Nielsen’s Alertbox column this week. Turns out that this is a question that nags at many developers, and that Jakob quite correctly puts in perspective:

In cases like this, it often doesn’t matter what you do. Either choice has good arguments in its favor, and no choice is likely to cause usability catastrophes.

Jakob points out that some interface choices matter a great deal more than others, and when in doubt it’s best to simply follow the norm for the platform in question. If you’re designing a desktop Windows app, follow those conventions. Designing for a Mac, follow Apple’s GUI standards:

Applying consistent design that follows user expectations saves people much more time (and many more mistakes) than doing something that might be a tiny bit more optimal for your application, but introduces an inconsistency.

Amen to that. And Jakob’s post is worth a close read for subtleties these quotes don’t capture. But I’d also venture another reason or two that cancel/ok (and other micro-usability puzzles) merit only so much attention.

Back at the supermarket, I swipe my credit card because I need the milk and I need the veggies. But most of us selling stuff online, are we lucky enough to offer something truly necessary? And for that matter, are we lucky enough to be the only site selling it?

You might sell fun stuff, cool stuff, relaxing stuff– but odds are that to one degree or another, the product you offer has been commoditized. Presenting that product in the most user-friendly, standards-compliant context is vital– but it’s often not enough to get the sale.

In our firm’s work making websites more effective, we find that embracing design and usability conventions is absolutely foundational, but is still only 1, critical dimension of success. What else matters? Giving people a reason to click that well-placed, intuitively labeled button.

How well does each page of your site convey your unique selling proposition? How effectively does your content seed the sale? Does each click forward maintain shopping scent? Do your pages persuade? Do they increase confidence and provide reassurance at the junctures that matter? Start with design and usability conventions, and then give your customer compelling reasons to click and buy. From you.

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

Your Comment

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2008/05/29/usable-sites-must-persuade-too/trackback/

Blogs Citing This Post

  1. Pingback: On Writing Effective Blog Post Titles on August 13, 2008

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Lance: George - Thanks so much for the interview and the kind words. Jake - We have seen the gains from our tests hold up. But I am sensitive to...
  • Andrew@BloggingGuide: I liked what he said: our approach is to never be satisfied, and always seek incremental improvement. This is absolutely true...
  • Jake Minturn: Great interview! One thing I am curious about, and I’d love to get Lance’s take on this, is if these boosts in conversion...
  • Bob: Would your call center stop answering sales calls because they’ve reached their budgeted labor for the month? This is considered...
  • David: Great post George, nice to see technology story telling alive. Kept me gripped and v interesting.
  • Rex Dixon: @George - That is too bad to hear. I don’t believe we have any PPC test results on our site currently.
  • George Michie: Ken, You’re absolutely right if the CR difference between A and B is small (2 or 3%) the odds of A running the table...
  • Ken Truman: Shay - I definitely think the same logic applies to day of week analysis. George - That’s an extremely interesting way of...
  • George Michie: Hi Laurence, We think folks spend far too much time worrying about mythical penalties. The account QS is dominated by the QS on your...
  • Laurence: Hi George, Thank you for the enlightening post. You’ve sold me on how important the long tail is so over the past few weeks...
  • Billy Wolt: take-away: Make sure you are bidding on your brand, broad topic, and specific model keywords :)
  • George Michie: Thanks for the kind words Lance and Bryan. Andy, I feel your pain. I meant to include a section on why site exclusions didn’t...
  • Algernon: Yay for yahoo! Just in time for them to shut it all down and hand the keys to Microsoft. Sorry, as an advertiser who got hammered for...
  • Bryan: Excellent post, George! Now lets cross our fingers that the folks at Microsoft give us the ability to adjust bids by syndication partner...
  • Lance: Brilliant post, George. Here’s hoping things pan out this way and everyone wins.

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 947
  • Words: 450,092
  • Comments: 2,843

Administration