RKG Logo 434-978-4300

zappos

Zappos comes up with some frequency in bar conversations with retailers and agencies at industry shows and events.

“But they’re still losing money,” is the oft-heard refrain from many Zappo-watchers both inside and outside the footwear industry.

So I noted with interest that CatalogSuccess reports Zappos Chairman/COO/CFO Alfred Lin stated last week at NCOF that

alfred lin, zappos

“after breaking even during its first six years, [Zappos] did post profits in 2006 and 2007.”

There you have it, from their CFO, as reported by Catalog Success: Zappos is profitable.

No discussion of how profitable, but black ink of any size is quite different than red.

And here’s the top line report:

  • 2000: $1.6 million annual sales
  • 2001: $8.6 million
  • 2002: $31.9 million
  • 2003: $70.1 million
  • 2004: $181 million
  • 2005: $370 million
  • 2006: $597 million
  • 2007: $840 million
  • 2008: $1 billion (projected)

Head spinning, isn’t it?

If Catalog Success accurately captured Lin’s statement — that is, if Zappo’s first six years of growth were at break-even and at not at tremendous losses — that would be boggling.

Amazon-style growth without the years of Amazon-style losses?

Retail’s laws of gravity repealed!

This is all second-hand, so I am taking it with a grain of salt, but it is quite interesting…

Link: Freewheeling Numbers From High-Flying Zappos.com, Catalog Success April 2008

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

    No related posts.

Comments

  1. Chris Zaharias, April 18, 2008:

    Zappos has been more adept at conversion optimization than virtually all of their competitors, and that’s allowed them to throw my traffic in the fire and spit out more revenues.

    The lesson in Zappos’ meteoric growth is:

    “He who converts best wins.”

    If you don’t live by web analytics, continuous testing and targeting improvements, you’re toast.

  2. Alan Rimm-Kaufman, April 18, 2008:

    “He who converts best wins” — Amen, Chris, we’re reading from the same book on that one.

Your Comment

Tags

RKG

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2008/04/17/zappos-profitability/trackback/

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • George Michie: Doesn’t have to be, it can be intra-adgroup as well.
  • Josh: George – I take it you’re referencing a scenario where your exact-match keywords are not listed as negative exact match keywords...
  • George Michie: Melissa, you’re right, it’s always happened to varying degrees, particularly since the advent of extended broad match....
  • Mel66: I don’t think this is a bug. It’s been happening for years. It *is* impossible to manage, and I can’t help but wonder if...
  • George Michie: Thanks Matt, Sometimes humor serves a purpose.
  • George Michie: Ken, sadly, as Jim stated above, too few people look under the hood and raise Cain. We’re very fortunate to have great reps on...
  • Matt: This is great! I started out reading this with the same anger that I feel everyday I spend unnecessary amounts of time optimizing to get...
  • Ken Truman: Right on, George. This is yet another one of the vagaries of broad matching that continues to drive smart advertisers mad. Your post...
  • George Michie: Interesting idea, Mark. The question might be: would advertisers know someone’s Twitter handle? Most require an email, but I...
  • @markthijssen: What if you would ask a consumer about his experience with the product some days/weeks/months after the sale via twitter. This might...
  • George Michie: Thanks Kenny, Another particularly annoying variation on the theme involves flashing the brand ads around on general searches. The...
  • Kenny: I’ve seen this happen too – very annoying, especially when the broad match ad that is served is specific to a particular...
  • George Michie: Jim, I think you’re right on that last piece. To me, Google doesn’t have to see this as either/or, by simply offering...
  • Jim Novo: I’ve also written about this “smart client” problem, the idea that a lot of what Google “suggests” or does...
  • Kathleen Raines: In my letter I did put the wrong month. I said April it should have been May.

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 948
  • Words: 451,089
  • Comments: 2,862

Administration