RKG Logo 434-978-4300

Some concepts are so fundamental, you assume everyone gets them right. Never assume anything when it comes to online advertising.

Bidding and the analysis that goes into fine tuning a flexible bidding system are critically important to a PPC program and are often neglected. Folks tend to spend too much time flipping copy, and not enough time studying the numbers. There is much more money to be made with the latter than with the former. I used to think the issue was simply not knowing what to with the numbers, but now I realize that some systems don’t really give folks access to the raw numbers needed for meaningful analysis.

In any analysis, step 1 is “Gather the raw data”. What happens if that data is hard to access, takes time and requires lots of manual manipulation to bring together in a useful format? The answer is obvious: not much analysis is going to take place.

Yet a number of professional SEM firms are in exactly this boat. Many SEM systems don’t use the atomic (ad level) cost and click data from the engines. They use estimates, and periodically do data pulls from the engines for reports back to the client.

This came as a total shock to me. How could it be that big companies — much much larger than us, who’ve been in this game longer than us — not get this right?

If the sales data is on one server and the cost and click data is on another server doing the analyses that are critical to success becomes impossible. Pulling the data together should take moments, but will take hours if numbers have to come from different servers.

An important technical question to ask any prospective SEM agency is: Do you have an API connection with each engine, and if so, do you store the daily ad level costs on your server? If their answer is “no” and you’re looking for first class results, you’ll need to look elsewhere.

Technorati Tags: , ,

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

    No related posts.

Comments

  1. Stephen, April 17, 2008:

    George,

    It is astonishing how little analysis is done by some large companies and agencies. One would think that they would have the money and resources to implement the most advanced tools and best practices. This is yet another indicator of the infancy of our industry segment. The next 10 years are going to exciting!

  2. George Michie, April 17, 2008:

    Thanks for your comment, Stephen, we certainly hope that expectations of agencies rise. The rising tide will sink those big ships that are anchored to the bottom. That will be a benefit to their clients and to the responsible firms that come to their clients’ rescue.

  3. Stephen, April 18, 2008:

    Cheers! I am in complete agreement with you. The anchor metaphor is spot on. :-)

  4. Adam, April 22, 2008:

    Great article, good advice. Here are a few other questions, in no particular order, that you should ask if you are looking for first-class results: 1. Do you have your own proprietary technology or are you using third-party solutions; 2. Do you have the ability to track phone orders; 3. If your website is designed to generate leads, do you have the ability to see how much revenue and profit each lead generates, or can you only judge the number of leads per ad and cost per lead? Ideally, you want a solution that will integrate with your back office so that as you move the lead to a sale you can tie the revenue back to the ads that were responsible; and 4. Do you give credit to conversions to the very last ad that was clicked or do you have the ability to see the team of ads that were clicked in gaining the conversion, so that you can allocate the revenue and profit credit across all of the ads that were involved? This is known in the industry as Purchase Path or Attribution Management.

Your Comment

Tags

RKG Tags: , ,

Technorati Tags: , ,

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2008/04/16/sem-data/trackback/

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Mark Ballard: Cory, I don’t see this as an SEO v. PPC issue. The core of my argument is that CTRs are lower primarily due to misleading...
  • Cory Grassell: What are your thoughts on stats that suggest consumers are more apt to click on organic search results than PPC results? As a...
  • George Michie: Kevin, Marc, thanks for your comments. Help is coming, but not the solution. There are a number of instances when the CTR on the...
  • Marc Adelman: George, You have been an advocate of “the advanced control option” for years now. Depressing right YEARS! Eh…listen...
  • Kevin Hill: Is what they really need is a fourth match type. Here’s google’s help documentation on broad match: This is the default...
  • Kevin Micalizzi, Dimdim Web Conferencing: Jim (& George)- We still offer a free version of Dimdim. Just click Sign Up Now at the top of the...
  • Tomas: indeed, i can’t talk about it either… :)
  • Philip Price: Thank you for the RegHack, it worked for me, tho at first when i made the reg file with the information i copied from above i also...
  • George Michie: Sorry Jim, this post was written in 2007. Apparently some of those products are gone.
  • Jim: Hey, I checked two products like dimdim and cutepdf but none is free. What are you talking about free and open source?
  • George Michie: If they keep hearing the same message, and seeing evidence in the data to back it up, something will have to give. There is hope on...
  • Tomas: I’ve been having the same argument with Google for months now and in the end there does seem to be a feature in the algorithm that...
  • George Michie: Doesn’t have to be, it can be intra-adgroup as well.
  • Josh: George – I take it you’re referencing a scenario where your exact-match keywords are not listed as negative exact match keywords...
  • George Michie: Melissa, you’re right, it’s always happened to varying degrees, particularly since the advent of extended broad match....

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 948
  • Words: 451,089
  • Comments: 2,877

Administration