RKG Logo 434-978-4300

I’m fascinated by Google’s recent announcement of Google App Engine.

Quoting Google,

Google App Engine enables developers to build web applications on the same scalable systems that power our own applications.
google app engine
No assembly required: Google App Engine exposes a fully-integrated development environment.

It’s easy to scale: Google App Engine makes it easy to design scalable applications that grow from one to millions of users without infrastructure headaches.

It’s free to get started: Every Google App Engine application will have enough CPU, bandwidth, and storage to serve around 5 million monthly pageviews.

Right now the only dev language is Python (snakes on a plane!), but others are promised.

The API currently provides storage (vs BigTable), authentication (via Google Accounts), templating (via Django), emailing, form handling, and URL fetching. Everything runs in the cloud, sandboxed, no writing to local files.

Here’s Google’s Brett Slakin demoing a guestbook in 10 minutes.

And here’s the resulting guestbook app: http://shoutout.appspot.com/.

Relevance to online retailers?

I don’t think AppEngine is going to change or revolutionize online commerce as a platform.

The hard problem in e-commerce isn’t scaling the technology, the hard problem is marketing, getting the customers.

But I do think AppEngine (and EC2, etc) could revolutionize the speed which new Web 2.0 communication apps are built.

In the next year or so, that may have implications for how online marketers communicate with customers and prospects.

My thoughts after reading the AppEngine docs was:

“Wow. With this tool, a smart small agile development team of three people could beta something like Twitter in a few days, or maybe Meebo in a few weeks, and release it, and if the world liked it, they could scale their app up to the planet, GoogleSizing it, with zero capex, zero sysadmin and zero hardware hassles, and simply pay for cycles/bandwidth/storage as it scaled, as it proved itself viable via revenue or pageviews or buzz or whatever. You’d build a layer between the code and the API to facilitate moving the app later to dedicated servers as needed if concerned about autonomy, but AppEngine slashes the VC needs of a startup even more — now the costs are really just people, no machines — and handles the scaling problem pretty far along the way.”

(I also thought, “Dang — I wish I had more depth in Python!”)

The apps available now are demos and toys, but more will come.

I guess the entrepreneur / developer considering AppEngine need to answer the “how much do I trust Google to park my app on it”, but I think that’s less of an issue for the freshly minted startup.

My prediction: cloud app platforms will increase the velocity of experimentation and deployment of new crazy marketing and communication ideas.

Overheard at Shop.orgSocialMedia2010:

What, you’re not advertising to teens via TwitzaZooMeeBling yet?!? You’re so far behind the times. They’re 90 days old but they’ve already hit 12 million registered users! And the only hardware they own are the founder’s laptops!

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

Comments

  1. friarminor, April 17, 2008:

    ‘Snakes on a plane’ just gave me the guffaws. :)

    And how about BigTable - which is the ’scale’ ingredient at the cost of lock in?

    Still, clouds are pretty neat in that they will allow plenty of app deploys (both ugly and cutting edge. Expect more big players to jump in the next few months.

    Oh, et us not forget that there are small players in the game, too like Morph eXchange which pre dates what Goog might actually do when the time comes for them to support Rails.

    Best.
    alain

  2. Robert Synnott, April 17, 2008:

    Not Meebo, at least for the moment. I wouldn’t be surprised if they do put in some sort of push messaging system eventually (they could use Google Talk infrastructure) but for the moment it’s very conventional-website oriented.

    Otherwise, though, I agree. I suspect that it’ll do a lot of damage to the webhosting industry, but quite frankly that industry _deserves_ it.

    friarmnor: Although BigTable might be hard to replicate entirely, there are existing less scalable (but still scalable) object database systems out there which should be able to provide the functionality that GAE’s one does.

  3. Alan Rimm-Kaufman, April 17, 2008:

    Robert: Meebo today — point well taken.

    Robert: why do you see this challenging the hosting (shared? dedicated? colo’d?) industry? I miss the immediate connection… IMHO, it is a different set of biz and IT skills to start a biz born in the cloud, vs. traditional hosting customer…

  4. Robert Synnott, April 18, 2008:

    I’d be very surprised if small contract developers don’t start using GAE; it’s a lot less trouble than the usual suspects.

    In addition, I’d say Google will shortly let people start selling GAE apps; you could, for instance, write a CRM and sell it to companies, with Google taking a cut.

    As to hosting, I think it’ll primarily hit shared.

Your Comment

Tags

RKG Tags: ,

Technorati Tags: ,

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2008/04/16/google-app-engine/trackback/

Blogs Citing This Post

  1. Pingback: Best Post Regarding App Engine Rimm-Kaufman Group « Hone Watson Bookmarks on April 16, 2008

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Nancy Kast: J.C. Penney –I am writing about your billing and online services. I have been receiving calls saying my bill is not paid. My...
  • Marc Adelman: George, Thanks for sharing this data. From an online buzz perspective, Bing is making a big splash. Everyone is talking about it....
  • George Michie: Hi Dennis, I’m not a lawyer, so take anything I say on this with a grain of salt (and please don’t sue us if we’re...
  • survey online: unfortunatelly i have to say that Google tools are the easiest survey web
  • Dennis Yu: Alan, We’ve had several C&D’s sent to us for seemingly innocuous issues. One of our casual dining clients bid on a...
  • George Michie: Hi Vivek, Haven’t had time to put together a full update, but I did take a look at the numbers. No material gains in market...
  • Karridy: You should checkout ClickPath’s call to KW tracking.
  • Vivek: George, really enjoying reading about the analysis you guys do. Was wondering if you have an update on this given a couple more weeks have...
  • Vicki Swaim: Dear Mr.Ullman, I hope you can help me with my problem. I ordered a TV stand the end of April that was advertised as a close out item....
  • Luke: It’s a shame we live in such a litigious society. Why should we have to set up an association? Surely we can prevent senseless...
  • George Michie: Josh, we have had shots fired over our bow and our client’s in the past. Usually responsible companies are reasonable about...
  • Ryan: Ok, George, I’m sufficiently scared… Thanks… :-) Incidentally, are there any trademark resources (other than Google...
  • Josh: We have run into trademark issues for several clients, although it has so far been a matter of trying to make “fair use” of a...
  • Mike: THANK YOU! I love you man!! :)
  • Matthew: Francis, We’ve likewise seen the “A-List” phenomenon in the past. Perhaps with Bing.com, there won’t be anymore of...

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 871
  • Words: 392,916
  • Comments: 2,079

Administration