RKG Logo 434-978-4300

It’s taken a few more days than expected, but I’m just about dug out from the Internet Retailer Web Design ‘08 show.

As the last of 34 speakers to present at this three day event, I fully expected to be talking site search with 9 people during my (ouch) Friday 3.30 PM slot. But wow, was I wrong. I was pleasantly blown away to find myself speaking to several hundred folks.

The majority of IR attendees wanted to eke every ounce of value out of this show, a nice testimony to the IR conference team, who put tons of smarts and love into this event.

What was the most interesting takeaway from this trip?

Bryan Eisenberg captured it quite nicely in his recap: Amazingly, retailers aren’t testing their websites yet!

I’ll say “Amen” to that– my experience at the show left me with similar impressions.

Bryan cites a mind-boggling stat from the survey Internet Retailer conducted before the show:

In a survey of the top 500 online retailers, 76.7% of retailers surveyed don’t test.

No multivariate testing, no A/B. This is particularly surprising given the availability of Google’s free testing platform.

And these are IR 500 folks, people who are all passionately dedicated to their sites.

One of the most popular events at the show were the free design consultations offered to attendees.

The demand for these consultations was so strong that it produced a waiting list. Bryan and I each ended up happily donating an extra day of our services — I’ve already seen downtown Miami, when in Rome, keep talking websites.

I had meetings with 19 different firms over 2 days.

All 19 were smart folks keen on making their sites sell more, but only 2 of the 19 had done some website testing.

That is, 90% of these sites had done zero testing.

Why is the number so low?

elephant1.jpg

Look for a long list of “Why websites don’t test” hypotheses later; here’s one thought for now:

When it comes to redesign, people are still trying to wrestle elephants.

Revamping your site for greater effectiveness and more sales isn’t about venturing into the design jungle for 6-12 months to wrestle a fat unwieldy beast.

The Grand Site Redesign elephant is… irrelevant. Also, it will step on you and it will hurt you.

The advent of low-cost testing is one more reason successful redesign is an ongoing process. It’s about moving quickly the cycle of measuring, testing, and making changes that help your site sell more (and make your visitors happier).

Bloated, ponderous, risky and costly — elephantine redesigns are out.

Nimble, tested, and provable site changes are in.

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

No Comments Yet

Your comment will be first!

Your Comment

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2008/02/14/site-redesign-means-site-testing/trackback/

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Lance: George - Thanks so much for the interview and the kind words. Jake - We have seen the gains from our tests hold up. But I am sensitive to...
  • Andrew@BloggingGuide: I liked what he said: our approach is to never be satisfied, and always seek incremental improvement. This is absolutely true...
  • Jake Minturn: Great interview! One thing I am curious about, and I’d love to get Lance’s take on this, is if these boosts in conversion...
  • Bob: Would your call center stop answering sales calls because they’ve reached their budgeted labor for the month? This is considered...
  • David: Great post George, nice to see technology story telling alive. Kept me gripped and v interesting.
  • Rex Dixon: @George - That is too bad to hear. I don’t believe we have any PPC test results on our site currently.
  • George Michie: Ken, You’re absolutely right if the CR difference between A and B is small (2 or 3%) the odds of A running the table...
  • Ken Truman: Shay - I definitely think the same logic applies to day of week analysis. George - That’s an extremely interesting way of...
  • George Michie: Hi Laurence, We think folks spend far too much time worrying about mythical penalties. The account QS is dominated by the QS on your...
  • Laurence: Hi George, Thank you for the enlightening post. You’ve sold me on how important the long tail is so over the past few weeks...
  • Billy Wolt: take-away: Make sure you are bidding on your brand, broad topic, and specific model keywords :)
  • George Michie: Thanks for the kind words Lance and Bryan. Andy, I feel your pain. I meant to include a section on why site exclusions didn’t...
  • Algernon: Yay for yahoo! Just in time for them to shut it all down and hand the keys to Microsoft. Sorry, as an advertiser who got hammered for...
  • Bryan: Excellent post, George! Now lets cross our fingers that the folks at Microsoft give us the ability to adjust bids by syndication partner...
  • Lance: Brilliant post, George. Here’s hoping things pan out this way and everyone wins.

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 947
  • Words: 450,092
  • Comments: 2,844

Administration