RKG Logo 434-978-4300

It’s taken a few more days than expected, but I’m just about dug out from the Internet Retailer Web Design ‘08 show.

As the last of 34 speakers to present at this three day event, I fully expected to be talking site search with 9 people during my (ouch) Friday 3.30 PM slot. But wow, was I wrong. I was pleasantly blown away to find myself speaking to several hundred folks.

The majority of IR attendees wanted to eke every ounce of value out of this show, a nice testimony to the IR conference team, who put tons of smarts and love into this event.

What was the most interesting takeaway from this trip?

Bryan Eisenberg captured it quite nicely in his recap: Amazingly, retailers aren’t testing their websites yet!

I’ll say “Amen” to that– my experience at the show left me with similar impressions.

Bryan cites a mind-boggling stat from the survey Internet Retailer conducted before the show:

In a survey of the top 500 online retailers, 76.7% of retailers surveyed don’t test.

No multivariate testing, no A/B. This is particularly surprising given the availability of Google’s free testing platform.

And these are IR 500 folks, people who are all passionately dedicated to their sites.

One of the most popular events at the show were the free design consultations offered to attendees.

The demand for these consultations was so strong that it produced a waiting list. Bryan and I each ended up happily donating an extra day of our services — I’ve already seen downtown Miami, when in Rome, keep talking websites.

I had meetings with 19 different firms over 2 days.

All 19 were smart folks keen on making their sites sell more, but only 2 of the 19 had done some website testing.

That is, 90% of these sites had done zero testing.

Why is the number so low?

elephant1.jpg

Look for a long list of “Why websites don’t test” hypotheses later; here’s one thought for now:

When it comes to redesign, people are still trying to wrestle elephants.

Revamping your site for greater effectiveness and more sales isn’t about venturing into the design jungle for 6-12 months to wrestle a fat unwieldy beast.

The Grand Site Redesign elephant is… irrelevant. Also, it will step on you and it will hurt you.

The advent of low-cost testing is one more reason successful redesign is an ongoing process. It’s about moving quickly the cycle of measuring, testing, and making changes that help your site sell more (and make your visitors happier).

Bloated, ponderous, risky and costly — elephantine redesigns are out.

Nimble, tested, and provable site changes are in.

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

No Comments Yet

Your comment will be first!

Your Comment

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2008/02/14/site-redesign-means-site-testing/trackback/

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Nancy Kast: I am writing about your billing and online services. I have been receiving calls saying my bill is not paid. My husband pays all our...
  • Marc Adelman: George, Thanks for sharing this data. From an online buzz perspective, Bing is making a big splash. Everyone is talking about it....
  • George Michie: Hi Dennis, I’m not a lawyer, so take anything I say on this with a grain of salt (and please don’t sue us if we’re...
  • survey online: unfortunatelly i have to say that Google tools are the easiest survey web
  • Dennis Yu: Alan, We’ve had several C&D’s sent to us for seemingly innocuous issues. One of our casual dining clients bid on a...
  • George Michie: Hi Vivek, Haven’t had time to put together a full update, but I did take a look at the numbers. No material gains in market...
  • Karridy: You should checkout ClickPath’s call to KW tracking.
  • Vivek: George, really enjoying reading about the analysis you guys do. Was wondering if you have an update on this given a couple more weeks have...
  • Vicki Swaim: Dear Mr.Ullman, I hope you can help me with my problem. I ordered a TV stand the end of April that was advertised as a close out item....
  • Luke: It’s a shame we live in such a litigious society. Why should we have to set up an association? Surely we can prevent senseless...
  • George Michie: Josh, we have had shots fired over our bow and our client’s in the past. Usually responsible companies are reasonable about...
  • Ryan: Ok, George, I’m sufficiently scared… Thanks… :-) Incidentally, are there any trademark resources (other than Google...
  • Josh: We have run into trademark issues for several clients, although it has so far been a matter of trying to make “fair use” of a...
  • Mike: THANK YOU! I love you man!! :)
  • Matthew: Francis, We’ve likewise seen the “A-List” phenomenon in the past. Perhaps with Bing.com, there won’t be anymore of...

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 871
  • Words: 392,916
  • Comments: 2,079

Administration