RKG Logo 434-978-4300

From today’s Washington Post, initial backlash against FaceBook’s Beacon advertising feature:

Sean Lane’s purchase was supposed to be a surprise for his wife. Then it appeared as a news headline — “Sean Lane bought 14k White Gold 1/5 ct Diamond Eternity Flower Ring from Overstock.com — last week on the social networking Web site Facebook.

Without Lane’s knowledge, the headline was visible to everyone in his online network, including 500 classmates from Columbia University and 220 other friends, co-workers, and acquaintances.

And his wife.

Within two hours after he bought the ring on Overstock.com, he received an instant message from his wife, Shannon: Who is this ring for?

What ring, he messaged back from his laptop at work in Waltham, Massachusetts.

She said Facebook had just put an item on his page saying he bought a ring. It included a link to Overstock, which noted the ring was priced at a 51% discount.

“I was really disappointed because for me the whole fun of Christmas is surprise,” said Shannon Lane, 28, who married Sean a year ago in September. “I never want to know what I am getting.”

The Post reports that last night Facebook made the default Beacon opt-in more clear.

14k White Gold 1/5ct Diamond Eternity Flower Ring

Technorati Tags:

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

    No related posts.

Comments

  1. rach, June 12, 2008:

    same thing happened to me (not w/ a ring but w/ another purchase). it was pretty bizarre!

Your Comment

Tags

RKG Tags:

Technorati Tags:

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2007/12/02/beacon-backlash/trackback/

Blogs Citing This Post

  1. Pingback: With All That Traffic, Does Facebook Test Its Site? on December 7, 2007
  2. Pingback: Privacy bei Facebook « Jans Links on January 21, 2008
  3. Pingback: theory.isthereason » Facebook Beacon: Now TWICE AS INSIDIOUS than before! on March 3, 2008

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • George Michie: Kevin, Marc, thanks for your comments. Help is coming, but not the solution. There are a number of instances when the CTR on the...
  • Marc Adelman: George, You have been an advocate of “the advanced control option” for years now. Depressing right YEARS! Eh…listen...
  • Kevin Hill: Is what they really need is a fourth match type. Here’s google’s help documentation on broad match: This is the default...
  • Kevin Micalizzi, Dimdim Web Conferencing: Jim (& George)- We still offer a free version of Dimdim. Just click Sign Up Now at the top of the...
  • Tomas: indeed, i can’t talk about it either… :)
  • Philip Price: Thank you for the RegHack, it worked for me, tho at first when i made the reg file with the information i copied from above i also...
  • George Michie: Sorry Jim, this post was written in 2007. Apparently some of those products are gone.
  • Jim: Hey, I checked two products like dimdim and cutepdf but none is free. What are you talking about free and open source?
  • George Michie: If they keep hearing the same message, and seeing evidence in the data to back it up, something will have to give. There is hope on...
  • Tomas: I’ve been having the same argument with Google for months now and in the end there does seem to be a feature in the algorithm that...
  • George Michie: Doesn’t have to be, it can be intra-adgroup as well.
  • Josh: George – I take it you’re referencing a scenario where your exact-match keywords are not listed as negative exact match keywords...
  • George Michie: Melissa, you’re right, it’s always happened to varying degrees, particularly since the advent of extended broad match....
  • Mel66: I don’t think this is a bug. It’s been happening for years. It *is* impossible to manage, and I can’t help but wonder if...
  • George Michie: Thanks Matt, Sometimes humor serves a purpose.

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 948
  • Words: 451,089
  • Comments: 2,874

Administration