RKG Logo 434-978-4300

To remain useful, maps are often revised to reflect changes in the actual terrain.

Last week a colleague sent me a link to Amazon’s Remodel, a beta redesign of Amazon’s site navigation. (The link might show you the same old Amazon — the remodel may be only intermittently and narrowly available).

Amazon Redesign

As the screenshot reveals, the big news is that tabs are history. Yep, the site that made tabs a ubiquitous e-commerce navigation convention is at least considering making them go away.

But of course, Amazon always used tabs incorrectly, anyway. Right? By coincidence, the morning I received the link to Amazon Tabless, I opened my weekly Alertbox email from Jakob Nielsen. The topic? Tabs, Used Right. Jakob’s review of the new Yahoo Finance Homepage commends the page for adhering to all 13 of his Tab Usability Guidelines.

Number One:
It uses tabs to alternate between views within the same context (not to navigate to different areas — a common mistake introduced by Amazon.com).

I have deep respect and admiration for Jakob Nielsen. and I learn something each time I read his work. But it strikes me as a bit odd to insist that Amazon uses tabs incorrectly. After all, as Jakob has also pointed out:

Users spend most of their time on other sites. This means that users prefer your site to work the same way as all the other sites they already know.

I believe that Amazon is one (or two, or 70) of those sites your customer already knows. Amazon’s reach gives them a voice that can set — or recast– convention. I’d suggest this means that for better or worse, Amazon’s use of tabs is the standard. To return to and possibly massacre the original metaphor: To remain useful, maps are often revised to reflect changes in the actual terrain. And Amazon’s big enough to rearrange the landscape now and then.

Does that mean that if Amazon’s new design is rolled out broadly, online retail navigation will swing back to what in beta looks like a return to left product navigation? Maybe.

Some retailers will continue to mimic Amazon, with varying degrees of success. But the smartest retailers will find even more value by going deeper. They’ll acknowledge Amazon’s impact on expectations, and then they’ll test the evolving standards with a design process driven by their own customers. Customers may violate our expectations as well as textbook conventions, but when we listen, they can tell us what works.

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

Your Comment

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2007/09/27/an-amazon-without-tabs-downright-wrong-or-finally-right-you-decide/trackback/

Blogs Citing This Post

  1. Pingback: The Puget News: Amazon’s Navigational Redesign: What People are Sayin’! (a meta-post) on September 27, 2007

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Nancy Kast: J.C. Penney –I am writing about your billing and online services. I have been receiving calls saying my bill is not paid. My...
  • Marc Adelman: George, Thanks for sharing this data. From an online buzz perspective, Bing is making a big splash. Everyone is talking about it....
  • George Michie: Hi Dennis, I’m not a lawyer, so take anything I say on this with a grain of salt (and please don’t sue us if we’re...
  • survey online: unfortunatelly i have to say that Google tools are the easiest survey web
  • Dennis Yu: Alan, We’ve had several C&D’s sent to us for seemingly innocuous issues. One of our casual dining clients bid on a...
  • George Michie: Hi Vivek, Haven’t had time to put together a full update, but I did take a look at the numbers. No material gains in market...
  • Karridy: You should checkout ClickPath’s call to KW tracking.
  • Vivek: George, really enjoying reading about the analysis you guys do. Was wondering if you have an update on this given a couple more weeks have...
  • Vicki Swaim: Dear Mr.Ullman, I hope you can help me with my problem. I ordered a TV stand the end of April that was advertised as a close out item....
  • Luke: It’s a shame we live in such a litigious society. Why should we have to set up an association? Surely we can prevent senseless...
  • George Michie: Josh, we have had shots fired over our bow and our client’s in the past. Usually responsible companies are reasonable about...
  • Ryan: Ok, George, I’m sufficiently scared… Thanks… :-) Incidentally, are there any trademark resources (other than Google...
  • Josh: We have run into trademark issues for several clients, although it has so far been a matter of trying to make “fair use” of a...
  • Mike: THANK YOU! I love you man!! :)
  • Matthew: Francis, We’ve likewise seen the “A-List” phenomenon in the past. Perhaps with Bing.com, there won’t be anymore of...

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 871
  • Words: 392,916
  • Comments: 2,079

Administration