RKG Logo 434-978-4300

When Google changes the game it’s important to pay attention!

Full details of the Google policy change.

As we see it there are two changes afoot:

  • Max CPC will be used instead of Avg CPC in conjunction with Quality Score to determine rank.
  • There will be a new minimum CPC applied for Top Placement.

The first of these fixes a bug in their logic and should help retailers. We certainly noticed instances in which newly launched keywords would essentially never gain traction and end up with $10 minimum bids to stay active. This was probably a function of Google looking at the actual CPCs rather than our bids when determining initial placement. We think this change will fix this type of problem.

The second, slipped in at the end of the announcement, is more troubling.

  • Does it mean that those beautiful sku-specific terms that have historically converted well at low cpcs due to lack of competition will face higher cpcs in order to show at the top?
  • Does it mean that cpcs on trademark terms will now go from 5 or 10 cents to $0.50 or more?

We don’t know. Hopefully, Google will be smart in how they apply this threshold, but we’ll have to wait and see.

Stay tuned, and be vigilant!

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

    No related posts.

No Comments Yet

Your comment will be first!

Your Comment

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2007/08/15/google-changes-ad-positioning-logic/trackback/

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • George Michie: Kevin, Marc, thanks for your comments. Help is coming, but not the solution. There are a number of instances when the CTR on the...
  • Marc Adelman: George, You have been an advocate of “the advanced control option” for years now. Depressing right YEARS! Eh…listen...
  • Kevin Hill: Is what they really need is a fourth match type. Here’s google’s help documentation on broad match: This is the default...
  • Kevin Micalizzi, Dimdim Web Conferencing: Jim (& George)- We still offer a free version of Dimdim. Just click Sign Up Now at the top of the...
  • Tomas: indeed, i can’t talk about it either… :)
  • Philip Price: Thank you for the RegHack, it worked for me, tho at first when i made the reg file with the information i copied from above i also...
  • George Michie: Sorry Jim, this post was written in 2007. Apparently some of those products are gone.
  • Jim: Hey, I checked two products like dimdim and cutepdf but none is free. What are you talking about free and open source?
  • George Michie: If they keep hearing the same message, and seeing evidence in the data to back it up, something will have to give. There is hope on...
  • Tomas: I’ve been having the same argument with Google for months now and in the end there does seem to be a feature in the algorithm that...
  • George Michie: Doesn’t have to be, it can be intra-adgroup as well.
  • Josh: George – I take it you’re referencing a scenario where your exact-match keywords are not listed as negative exact match keywords...
  • George Michie: Melissa, you’re right, it’s always happened to varying degrees, particularly since the advent of extended broad match....
  • Mel66: I don’t think this is a bug. It’s been happening for years. It *is* impossible to manage, and I can’t help but wonder if...
  • George Michie: Thanks Matt, Sometimes humor serves a purpose.

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 948
  • Words: 451,089
  • Comments: 2,874

Administration