RKG Logo

Our agency’s PPC advertising share across Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft in June 2007 remained relatively stable in June from May.

Google continues to dominate, with three-fourths share. For the third month running, Microsoft took one point of share from Google, rising to 6%. Yahoo held steady at 21%. These are very small share changes and should be interpreted accordingly.

We note that our firm has been growing steadily year-to-date, so total client ad spend under management is up significantly in absolute dollars. These share numbers reflect the proportions of those dollars going to G, Y, and M.

As previously mentioned, nearly all of our clients instruct us to run their paid search campaigns to achieve their economic goals. That is, none of our clients establish a priori budget levels by engine. Our portfolio bidding platform optimizes ad budgets, buying the most effective clicks first. Thus, an increase in ad spend on one engine, relative to the others, reflects an increase in click quality relative to the others.

google yahoo microsoft paid search share june 2007

Here are those data from the Big Three in tabular form.

Month Google Yahoo Microsoft
2007-01 73% 22% 5%
2007-02 70% 26% 5%
2007-03 72% 24% 4%
2007-04 76% 20% 4%
2007-05 74% 21% 5%
2007-06 73% 21% 6%

These data represent our clients’ experience in aggregate. As always, your mileage may vary.

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.

Share this post (via email, Digg, Delicious, etc)

Similar Posts

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2007/07/15/ppc-share-june-2007/trackback/

Blogs Citing This Post

  1. Pingback: Google, Yahoo, Microsoft Market Share Report, September 2007 on October 8, 2007
  2. Pingback: Our Take on the Microsoft Bid For Yahoo! - Accession Media, LLC on February 2, 2008

Comments

  1. Hey Alan,

    This is some great info. I would also be very interested in seeing a trend analysis of this over, say the last several years. I have been pondering this ever since I spun a related story that came out on Friday which forecasts that Google is “poised to own 90% of the market based solely on R&D investments”:
    http://sphinn.com/story/385

    I firmly believe this is purely speculative unless we have some hard numbers (non R&D based) to justify it and thought a search-share trend analysis would provide somewhat of an adequate forecast if we went back far in enough.

    My anecdotal thoughts are given the state of their current business model (advertising based, primarily through paid search), they would need to overtake their direct search engine competitors through competitive business practices/better tech AND/OR just flat out buy them.

    However, their “competitive business practices” are raising a few privacy eye brows these days, to say the least, and Yahoo! attempted the latter (rollup strategy) a few years ago but it did not work (remember good ole market leaders like AltaVista, and Fast?). In addition, after all of the Microsoft anti-trust trials, I would find it very difficult to believe that Google would pass the antitrust litmus test required to Green Light such a deal.

    All that said, I think the numbers would speak for themselves if we saw how different engines have risen and fallen over the years, and more importantly, where Google is forecasted to go.

    My $.02,

    -RL

Your Comment

We "do-follow" links in comments. This may help your search rankings. Learn more...

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Rachel Harper: Dear Mr. Ullman, I worked for JCpenney for almost 18 years. In the past servely months they deceied to change my job disription....
  • Harry Joiner: GREAT question. Very thought provoking. I shall steal this.
  • IM: The presentation is just amazing!
  • Alan Rimm-Kaufman: Thanks for the thoughtful comment, Mark. Do feel free to drop off some of those free video soda machines at our offices any time...
  • Pay Per Click Journal: Honestly we never thought that social networking ads really worked - that is until we saw recent data. We are surprised but...
  • Mark Pilipczuk: Excellent article and definitely worth the time to read. A few other tidbits caught my eye: * There are 150 people working on...
  • Jeff Cornejo: Maybe the business is not in the social network, but in the services that spring up around the social network...which get acquired....
  • Tad Miller: Larry, I blogged about this a few weeks ago and the press I found from E-commerce people all seemed to indicate that the gas prices...
  • Matthew: Why not use Joomla? I mean its a CMS... Wordpress really isnt its more for blogging and even Joomla can do that.
  • Truck Accessories: I sincerely hope that not too much marketing effort goes into playing on the fears surrounding this energy crisis. Not only is...
  • mike: I work for a small software company in Colorado and we're going the solar route after hearing about Google. It's a fantastic idea and I'm...
  • Matthew: When we paid for ads, we only noticed about a 10% increase in traffic from them which almost broke even
  • Mark Pilipczuk: "Befuddled" is too kind. This is rubbish, and coming from a very skilled DR-focused company, it's incredibly disappointing and a...
  • George Michie: Mike, thanks so much for your insightful comments! Gayle, you're right there are more types than these. The spotlight I wanted to...
  • Gayle Dallaston: There are many more types of affiliates than the three you mention - although unfortunately they may be the most common of the...

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 715
  • Words: 312,021
  • Comments: 1,055

Administration

Close
  • Social Web
  • E-mail
Powered by ShareThis