RKG Logo

Your marketing message can’t be effective if your prospect can’t read it.

A slightly off-topic rant on Office 2007:

Leading a growing paid search agency that’s hiring regularly, many resumes flow into my in-box each week. My current hiring pet peeve is receiving resumes in Office 2007 format. These are files which have the “.docx” extension.

I can’t open these resumes with a click, so into the trash they typically go, unconsidered. Apologies, but true.

Now, I happen to have Vista and Office ’07 at home (ugh), but I do not have these at work. Our IT folks are holding our firm on XP and Office 2003 as long as we can hold out. On the OS side, Vista isn’t baked enough, our IT gurus believe. On the apps side, I fear the productivity slowdown of switching to Office 2007, when for the first week or so our amazing crew of power Excel users won’t be able to find anything anymore. (If you’re not using 2007 yet: all the Excel menus changed. A lot. You may pull out your hair just finding pivot tables in Excel ’07, or trying to format several graphs in parallel. Argh.)

Job seekers: hiring managers are moving fast. Hiring managers looking for a reason to zap your resume. You win when you make life easier for the hiring manager.

Sending a resume just in “.docx” is almost rude, in my opinion. Seeing just a “.docx” resume makes me wonder if the candidate is out-of-touch (because she/he doesn’t realize Office 2007 isn’t broadly adopted yet), or not technically savvy (because she/he doesn’t understand file types), or perhaps self-absorbed (because she/he assumes that everyone is using the latest-and-greatest out of Redmond, like him/her). Truly, I don’t spend much time on this wondering, as usually I’ve moved on.

My nickel suggestion: send a resume in multiple formats.

  • Plain text, in-line in the email below your sig, is always good. (I also like to see a resume well-presented in plain ascii – that suggests the candidate will be able to compose good-looking text emails.)
  • PDF attachment is also good — it shows the candidate cares enough to control the page layout and typography. (Suggestion: if you use PDF, don’t PDF an ugly resume – ugh.)
  • Or use Word if you want, but be smart and use Word 2003 (“.doc”, not “.docx”). 2007 Word can read 2003 Word seamlessly, but not the reverse, so use 2003.

Just avoid “.docx” as a sole resume format.

As with any marketing message, you win when you make life easier for your prospect.

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.

Share this post (via email, Digg, Delicious, etc)

Similar Posts

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2007/06/16/getting-your-resume-read-or-why-office-2007-is-not-your-friend/trackback/

No Comments Yet

Your comment will be first!

Your Comment

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Gab Goldenberg: Been reading your posts and George's and other RKG ones for a while Alan, and this both looks like fun and a very nice initiative!...
  • Alan Rimm-Kaufman: Terry -- Thanks for catching the smart quote problem -- Fixed above now, hopefully -- Cheers -- Alan
  • Msn Avatarları: very good, thank you..
  • Terry: OK, your website changes straight double quotes to smart quotes, so my post doesn't look right. Just replace the quotes in your formula in...
  • Terry: 13. Tom, February 22, 2008: "When I do row B, it gives an “The formula contains unrecognized text”… And so when I paste the values,...
  • uttoransen: hi, nice article! actually it always the ROI that matters, is the sales are ok with the seo expense then it's always worth the service.
  • consultoria: RSS is one of the most amazing tools I've found in my programming career, it’s just amazing how this little XML file can create huge...
  • consultoria: It’s kind of hard to find a patterned way of creating good posts, I think experience, knowing trends, using viral and social roads...
  • Wadzie Kay: http://jott.com/default.aspx Does the above link still work,i desperately need software to transcribe words to text. I hope you will be...
  • Router Bench: So what happened? I am curious...
  • Alan Rimm-Kaufman: Yes, a dash of sensationalism can help, but going too far and writing titles only for link-baiting value doesn't feel good to...
  • Stephen Schramke: Definitely thought provoking... lots of grains of truth. Thanks for sharing!
  • Router Bench: Ahh so, Ok I get it. But don't you think that titles that are self aggrandizing or exaggerate the subject can also be more effective....
  • Alan Rimm-Kaufman: Most important words first. Not unlike optimizing a HTML TITLE tag for SEO.
  • Router Bench: Here is where I decided to be a little different, I use a few different plugins starting with Aksimet to allow me to moderate first...

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 729
  • Words: 322,676
  • Comments: 1,175

Administration

Close
  • Social Web
  • E-mail
Powered by ShareThis