RKG Logo 434-978-4300

Your marketing message can’t be effective if your prospect can’t read it.

A slightly off-topic rant on Office 2007:

Leading a growing paid search agency that’s hiring regularly, many resumes flow into my in-box each week. My current hiring pet peeve is receiving resumes in Office 2007 format. These are files which have the “.docx” extension.

I can’t open these resumes with a click, so into the trash they typically go, unconsidered. Apologies, but true.

Now, I happen to have Vista and Office ’07 at home (ugh), but I do not have these at work. Our IT folks are holding our firm on XP and Office 2003 as long as we can hold out. On the OS side, Vista isn’t baked enough, our IT gurus believe. On the apps side, I fear the productivity slowdown of switching to Office 2007, when for the first week or so our amazing crew of power Excel users won’t be able to find anything anymore. (If you’re not using 2007 yet: all the Excel menus changed. A lot. You may pull out your hair just finding pivot tables in Excel ’07, or trying to format several graphs in parallel. Argh.)

Job seekers: hiring managers are moving fast. Hiring managers looking for a reason to zap your resume. You win when you make life easier for the hiring manager.

Sending a resume just in “.docx” is almost rude, in my opinion. Seeing just a “.docx” resume makes me wonder if the candidate is out-of-touch (because she/he doesn’t realize Office 2007 isn’t broadly adopted yet), or not technically savvy (because she/he doesn’t understand file types), or perhaps self-absorbed (because she/he assumes that everyone is using the latest-and-greatest out of Redmond, like him/her). Truly, I don’t spend much time on this wondering, as usually I’ve moved on.

My nickel suggestion: send a resume in multiple formats.

  • Plain text, in-line in the email below your sig, is always good. (I also like to see a resume well-presented in plain ascii – that suggests the candidate will be able to compose good-looking text emails.)
  • PDF attachment is also good — it shows the candidate cares enough to control the page layout and typography. (Suggestion: if you use PDF, don’t PDF an ugly resume – ugh.)
  • Or use Word if you want, but be smart and use Word 2003 (“.doc”, not “.docx”). 2007 Word can read 2003 Word seamlessly, but not the reverse, so use 2003.

Just avoid “.docx” as a sole resume format.

As with any marketing message, you win when you make life easier for your prospect.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

    No related posts.

Comments

  1. yuku, January 21, 2009:

    My friend said that he had sent his resume in docx format. I was sure somebody already ranted for this, so instead of ranting, I googled {resume in docx} and found this. Perfect!

  2. Eric, April 7, 2009:

    Just finished my resume using Office 2007 Word, and noticed the file was saved as docx format which I did not recognize as being standard at my company. Before being laid off last week, our company only supported Office 2003. So I googled “resume docx” because I was curious about accepted resume file formats before I send/post it and found your valuable article. Thank you for the great information because I would have never known until today that docx was undesired by hiring professionals.

Your Comment

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2007/06/16/getting-your-resume-read-or-why-office-2007-is-not-your-friend/trackback/

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • George Michie: Kevin, Marc, thanks for your comments. Help is coming, but not the solution. There are a number of instances when the CTR on the...
  • Marc Adelman: George, You have been an advocate of “the advanced control option” for years now. Depressing right YEARS! Eh…listen...
  • Kevin Hill: Is what they really need is a fourth match type. Here’s google’s help documentation on broad match: This is the default...
  • Kevin Micalizzi, Dimdim Web Conferencing: Jim (& George)- We still offer a free version of Dimdim. Just click Sign Up Now at the top of the...
  • Tomas: indeed, i can’t talk about it either… :)
  • Philip Price: Thank you for the RegHack, it worked for me, tho at first when i made the reg file with the information i copied from above i also...
  • George Michie: Sorry Jim, this post was written in 2007. Apparently some of those products are gone.
  • Jim: Hey, I checked two products like dimdim and cutepdf but none is free. What are you talking about free and open source?
  • George Michie: If they keep hearing the same message, and seeing evidence in the data to back it up, something will have to give. There is hope on...
  • Tomas: I’ve been having the same argument with Google for months now and in the end there does seem to be a feature in the algorithm that...
  • George Michie: Doesn’t have to be, it can be intra-adgroup as well.
  • Josh: George – I take it you’re referencing a scenario where your exact-match keywords are not listed as negative exact match keywords...
  • George Michie: Melissa, you’re right, it’s always happened to varying degrees, particularly since the advent of extended broad match....
  • Mel66: I don’t think this is a bug. It’s been happening for years. It *is* impossible to manage, and I can’t help but wonder if...
  • George Michie: Thanks Matt, Sometimes humor serves a purpose.

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 948
  • Words: 451,089
  • Comments: 2,875

Administration