| Title: | Yahoo “Panama” Geo-Targeting: US Only + Canada Only != Entire Market |
| URL: | http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2007/04/18/panama-geotargeting/ |
| Printed: | July 11, 2009 |
| Source: | The Rimm-Kaufman Group Blog, info@rimmkaufman.com |
- April 18, 2007
- 5 comments
On Yahoo’s new Panama platform, geo-targeting for all campaigns defaults to “Entire Market,” which includes the US and Canada. When our team learned this, we turned off Canada for many of our Yahoo accounts to avoid driving unqualified traffic to our US-only retailer sites. Research into our database told us that only about 2% of the current traffic for these clients was coming from Yahoo Canada and costs were trivial, but we figured it would be best to exclude Canada to save some money.
Not so. Some of our clients experienced a major drop-off in traffic on some of their top keywords. Others reported that ads were being served normally in some parts of the country, but not at all in others. Yahoo confirmed our suspicion that since geo-targeting locates a user by IP address, if an IP address cannot be determined, the user goes into an “Unknown” bucket. Thus ad campaigns limited to “US Only” are not visible to these Unknowns, and traffic drops off; Unknowns are only served ads from campaigns set to “Entire Market”.
Yahoo says that about 5%-20% of searchers end up in this Unknown bucket – a range which can vary across markets. Our team decided that the small costs of including Canada in geo-targeting far outweighs the risk of losing a large portion of qualified traffic.
We find ourselves faced with a real dilemma for clients that have two Yahoo accounts, one for their US site and the other for a site dedicated to a Canadian market only. Do we turn on Entire Market for the US account and let these campaigns compete against our Canada Only campaigns? Or do we set each account to US Only and Canada Only, excluding all of those Unknowns? Neither is ideal, but a couple weeks of testing should give us some sense of which is the better solution.
– Kate Spanos
If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.
Related Posts
- Google, Yahoo “Panama”, and Microsoft: Paid Search Market Share May 2007 We review May 2007 ad spend data for our agency. Google continues to dominate, with three fourths share. Google lost one point of share each...
- April 2007 PPC Share for Google, Yahoo Panama, Microsoft April showed Google seizing yet more share from Yahoo, with Microsoft holding steady in distant third....
- Feb 2007 Results: Yahoo ‘Panama’ Siezes Back Share From Google In February, Yahoo aggressively took back share from Google, returning to Jan 2006 levels. Digging into our largest 50 accounts, the average percentage change in...
- March 2007 PPC Spend Results For Google, Yahoo “Panama”, Microsoft While aggregate spend on all three engines were up in absolute dollar terms, Yahoo slipped back a tiny bit relative to Google in terms of...
Comments
Your Comment
Trackback
http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2007/04/18/panama-geotargeting/trackback/Blogs Citing This Post
- Trackback: Apogee Weblog on June 4, 2007
- Pingback: Yahoo! Rejects Microsoft’s Bid (No SEO Duopoly Please) : The Blog Herald on February 9, 2008
- Pingback: Top 5 Settings to Check When Starting a Yahoo! Search Marketing Account | The Adventures of PPC Hero on October 30, 2008
Any idea as to what percentage of national search traffic tends to fall into that “unknown” category?
We ran into the same issue, and Yahoo said the same thing - almost word for word - so I’m thinking they are definitely aware that this is an issue, but they don’t want to do anything to fix it. With the B2B insurance vertical, it was a huge drop off in traffic due to many people searching from corporate IPs which are a big amount of the “unknowns”.
The Canada & US combination does not make sense and over complicates an issue that really should be simple.