RKG Logo 434-978-4300

In an earlier post, I suggested that if Microsoft bought DoubleClick, Google would launch a competing network and price it close enough to free to crush Redmond’s acquisition. As instead Google grabbed the deal, here are my revised observations and prognostications, with weekend help from smart writers across the blogosphere.

* Like Paul Graham wrote, Microsoft is dead. For those needing the Cliff notes, “dead” doesn’t mean MSFT is going away. It means they’re just not relevant anymore. And Graham was writing before this DoubleClick deal.

* Paul Bryant suggests one way Microsoft could kill Google: block all text ads in IE. My favorite quote from Paul’s post: Microsoft would probably need to block their own ads too, in order to make the effort legitimate, but how big a loss would that be for them really, on a relative basis? Not going to happen, but interesting.

* Microsoft & ATT are already shouting “antitrust”. Expect a DOJ or Senate investigation into Google’s “monoply” in 2007/2008.

* Google will sell Performics off from DoubleClick (Stephan Spencer’s scenario #1), just to avoid adding fuel to the antitrust fire.

* Google will assimilate DoubleClick’s patents and IP (nice discussion from Bill Slawski about those) , but suspect they’ll scrap rapidly scrap the Doublclick codebase and rebuild it. Google didn’t buy DoubleClick for technology: they’d rather build their own bricks (from Eric Schmidt). I’d wager the DoubleClick code is a few years old and crufty. Google will rapidly rebuild it, integrate it into the AdWords interface, and sell the advertising via the auction model, CPM and CPC both.

* Google bought DoubleClick for the advertiser relationships ($100m or $300m per year?). But even more important, Google bought DoubleClick to cut off Microsoft’s future air supply (Paul Kedrosky).

* Microsoft will make an offer to aquire Yahoo! within 12 months. Not sure if that deal will go through, but I’m pessimistic about the success of such a merger if it did.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

No Comments Yet

Your comment will be first!

Your Comment

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2007/04/16/doubleclick-ruminations-google-yahoo-and-microsoft/trackback/

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Mark Ballard: Cory, I don’t see this as an SEO v. PPC issue. The core of my argument is that CTRs are lower primarily due to misleading...
  • Cory Grassell: What are your thoughts on stats that suggest consumers are more apt to click on organic search results than PPC results? As a...
  • George Michie: Kevin, Marc, thanks for your comments. Help is coming, but not the solution. There are a number of instances when the CTR on the...
  • Marc Adelman: George, You have been an advocate of “the advanced control option” for years now. Depressing right YEARS! Eh…listen...
  • Kevin Hill: Is what they really need is a fourth match type. Here’s google’s help documentation on broad match: This is the default...
  • Kevin Micalizzi, Dimdim Web Conferencing: Jim (& George)- We still offer a free version of Dimdim. Just click Sign Up Now at the top of the...
  • Tomas: indeed, i can’t talk about it either… :)
  • Philip Price: Thank you for the RegHack, it worked for me, tho at first when i made the reg file with the information i copied from above i also...
  • George Michie: Sorry Jim, this post was written in 2007. Apparently some of those products are gone.
  • Jim: Hey, I checked two products like dimdim and cutepdf but none is free. What are you talking about free and open source?
  • George Michie: If they keep hearing the same message, and seeing evidence in the data to back it up, something will have to give. There is hope on...
  • Tomas: I’ve been having the same argument with Google for months now and in the end there does seem to be a feature in the algorithm that...
  • George Michie: Doesn’t have to be, it can be intra-adgroup as well.
  • Josh: George – I take it you’re referencing a scenario where your exact-match keywords are not listed as negative exact match keywords...
  • George Michie: Melissa, you’re right, it’s always happened to varying degrees, particularly since the advent of extended broad match....

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 948
  • Words: 451,089
  • Comments: 2,877

Administration