RKG Logo


We’ve been watching Yahoo’s share of our client’s pay-per-click spend with additional attention since the release of Panama. Across our clients, at least, in 2007 Yahoo recovered much of the ground they lost to Google in 2006.

As mentioned in earlier posts on this subject, the overwhelming majority of our clients instruct us to run their paid search campaigns to achieve their economic goals. None of our clients mandate a priori budget levels by engine. Our portfolio bidding platform optimizes ad budgets, buying the best clicks first. Thus, an increase in spend on an engine reflects an increase in click quality, such as improved conversion or sales per click, relative to the other engines.

Anyway, here are aggregated ad spend results aggregated for March for the Big Three. Data from approximately 100 significant sites, mix is roughly 90% B2C and 10% B2B, nearly all retailers.

Month Google Yahoo MSN
2007-01 73% 22% 5%
2007-02 70% 26% 5%
2007-03 72% 24% 4%

While aggregate spend on all three engines was up in absolute dollar terms, Yahoo slipped back a tiny bit relative to Google in terms of percentage share. Most of Y’s big gain in share since Panama remains.

This chart represents our agency’s client’s experience; your mileage may vary.

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.

Share this post (via email, Digg, Delicious, etc)

Similar Posts

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2007/04/12/march-2007-ppc-spend-results-for-google-yahoo-panama-microsoft/trackback/

Blogs Citing This Post

  1. Pingback: April 2007 PPC Share for Google, Yahoo Panama, Microsoft on August 3, 2008

Your Comment

We "do-follow" links in comments. This may help your search rankings. Learn more...

Tags

RKG: ,
Technorati: ,

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • George Michie: Thank you for your insights, Mark! It's good to get different perspectives.
  • Mark Pilipczuk: Thanks for taking the time to look into my model and commenting back, George. I re-checked my model to make sure there were no...
  • SYP: I am honored to be mentioned in such esteemed company. Thank you. Virtual single malts all around. :) --So Young.
  • Web Design Zoo: Thanks for that. Already had Dan Cederholm's book, may use my amazon vouchers and get a few of these titles.
  • George Michie: Interesting idea, Mark, but I'm not sure I agree with your analysis. I thought of this the following way. Let's say the AOV is $100...
  • Martin Botťánek: Very interesting and well written article. Thanks. Actually, I believe almost everyone in marketing understands that spending...
  • Mark Pilipczuk: Very useful. I hope folks take the time to read and understand this. I played around with the numbers on my own because I asked...
  • George Michie: Hi Ankur, We think these are important questions, but we don't think the answer is the same for every company. Not every company...
  • Ankur Mody: Hi Alan, This is like advanced PPC from a statistician point of view. I feel you are posing a question and answering at the same time...
  • Capitol Hill Condo: This is some very interesting information about how real estate will be advertised on google.
  • Mark Pilipczuk: The inability for a lot of companies to hire within 120 days for senior level positions is a problem that, like Harry, I find far...
  • Simonbike: I love your blog...really. Did you already hear about water on mars? :)
  • John: Like I expected Google has lost money due to the recent 'slap' of 1th April. Hopefully they learned from this that there is a good...
  • j: thank u so much! i think this saved me from the recurring orders that proactiv kept sending me. i even called them to cancel and it wasn't...
  • James: 13. Tom, February 22, 2008: When I do row B, it gives an “The formula contains unrecognized text”… And so when I paste the values,...

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 723
  • Words: 319,515
  • Comments: 1,104

Administration

Close
  • Social Web
  • E-mail
Powered by ShareThis