RKG Logo 434-978-4300

For many online marketers, pay-per-click search is the largest single line in their web marketing budget. Just as you should visit your dentist twice a year for a checkup, you should also conduct a routine search marketing audit every six months or so. Regular checkups ensure your PPC campaigns stay healthy, whether managed by an agency or in-house.

A comprehensive PPC audit has four components: an order data audit, a cost data audit, a bid audit, and a marketing performance audit. The data audits make sure you’re working with accurate numbers. The bid audit is a spot-check of your bidding robot or people. The marketing performance audit ensures your campaigns make sense overall. These aren’t as much work as they sound — with the data in hand, all four components combined might take an afternoon or so. And the payoff can be considerable.

Today, we’ll cover the first of these four: the PPC order audit.

Here’s how to do it. Pick a recent calendar month. From your search agency or in-house team, get the total sales attributed to PPC search over that month. Also get a detailed list of every order attributed to PPC search over that month, with order time and date stamp, order total, the search ad which drove the order, and the click time and date stamp. Make sure reported total sales match the sum of the order totals.

Next, from your order management system, obtain a detailed list of every order taken through your website over the month. For each order, pull order time and date, order total, and the marketing channel credited with the sale (unknown, search, affiliate, email, etc.) Compare the two order detail lists in Excel, matching orders by date, time, and amount. You should be able to find every search-attributed order within the full list of web orders–and those orders should be credited to paid search.

If you find orders on the PPC list which are assigned to a non-PPC marketing channel on the all-web list, that’s a red flag. This is “double counting,” where one order gets attributed to multiple programs. Dig into these cases, and see why the different systems disagree on what drove the order. Causes can range from the innocent (different tracking cookies, different order allocation windows, errors in tracking or allocation software) to the nefarious (malware, unethical agency tactics).

Checking that PPC sales tie out across different tracking systems sounds rudimentary, and in truth, it is. Nonetheless, this exercise is often highly instructive, as there are so many places that tracking or allocation can go awry.

Next in this series: the ppc cost audit.


All posts in the PPC Audit series:

  1. PPC Cost Audit
  2. PPC paid search Sales Audit
  3. PPC paid search Bidding Audit
  4. PPC paid search Marketing Audit

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

Your Comment

Tags

RKG Tags:

Technorati Tags:

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2007/03/26/search-tip-ppc-order-audit/trackback/

Blogs Citing This Post

  1. Pingback: PPC News Roundup for March 27, 2007 | The Adventures of PPC Hero on September 29, 2008

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Nancy Kast: J.C. Penney –I am writing about your billing and online services. I have been receiving calls saying my bill is not paid. My...
  • Marc Adelman: George, Thanks for sharing this data. From an online buzz perspective, Bing is making a big splash. Everyone is talking about it....
  • George Michie: Hi Dennis, I’m not a lawyer, so take anything I say on this with a grain of salt (and please don’t sue us if we’re...
  • survey online: unfortunatelly i have to say that Google tools are the easiest survey web
  • Dennis Yu: Alan, We’ve had several C&D’s sent to us for seemingly innocuous issues. One of our casual dining clients bid on a...
  • George Michie: Hi Vivek, Haven’t had time to put together a full update, but I did take a look at the numbers. No material gains in market...
  • Karridy: You should checkout ClickPath’s call to KW tracking.
  • Vivek: George, really enjoying reading about the analysis you guys do. Was wondering if you have an update on this given a couple more weeks have...
  • Vicki Swaim: Dear Mr.Ullman, I hope you can help me with my problem. I ordered a TV stand the end of April that was advertised as a close out item....
  • Luke: It’s a shame we live in such a litigious society. Why should we have to set up an association? Surely we can prevent senseless...
  • George Michie: Josh, we have had shots fired over our bow and our client’s in the past. Usually responsible companies are reasonable about...
  • Ryan: Ok, George, I’m sufficiently scared… Thanks… :-) Incidentally, are there any trademark resources (other than Google...
  • Josh: We have run into trademark issues for several clients, although it has so far been a matter of trying to make “fair use” of a...
  • Mike: THANK YOU! I love you man!! :)
  • Matthew: Francis, We’ve likewise seen the “A-List” phenomenon in the past. Perhaps with Bing.com, there won’t be anymore of...

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 871
  • Words: 392,916
  • Comments: 2,079

Administration