RKG Logo

I scratched my head over this advice from John Jantsch over at Duct Tape Marketing — until I realized John’s audience is small physical businesses, not direct marketers. He wrote:

Tripling or quadrupling your lead conversion number is usually the easiest thing to do once you start paying attention to it. It’s much harder to triple the number of leads so focus on what you say and do on the phone and across the desk, prepare marketing materials that over educate and get everyone in your firm on the same page when it comes to telling the value proposition you have.

It is the opposite situation in direct marketing.

It is usually far far easier to double leads (increase circ, rollout more keywords, rent more lists, join a new coop, test alternative media, etc.) than it is to double conversion (response rate, site conversion rate, etc).

Raising conversion rate is hard. That doesn’t mean marketers shouldn’t obsess on improving site conversion or catalog response rate; we all should. But the quickest,easiest, more direct (pun intended) way to grow top line is by getting more qualified leads.

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.

Share this post (via email, Digg, Delicious, etc)

Possibly Similar Posts

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2007/03/09/direct-marketing-focus-leads-vs-conversion/trackback/

No Comments Yet

Your comment will be first!

Your Comment

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • George Michie: Thanks for your comments Ophir, you raise excellent points. Particularly as Geo-targeting competition in different areas moves...
  • SEO Services: Nice Post. Thanks for sharing this information with us.
  • Ophir Cohen: The Problem with Positions in SEM The whole concept of positions (1 vs 3 vs 15) has a lot of meaning when the goal of a campaign is...
  • George Michie: Thanks for your thoughts, Jason. I like your metaphor of the millions of query "channels". Indeed it may be that poor converting...
  • George Michie: Thanks Christian, I think they simply present those aggregate figures to highlight the difficulty: the data is incredibly sparse,...
  • Jason Anderson: Interesting Post. Seems likely that the same forces that produce a mix of regional and national advertising on television will...
  • Christian Little: Hey George, Regarding the university study, I read it over and I don't understand all the math, but I don't think it could be...
  • Elaine: Alan, Thanks for the Great post. As Eric mentioned, I'd love to see more on year-over-year analysis when you have it.
  • George Michie: Jonathan, thanks for your comment. I look forward to reading your book! Some Direct Marketers worry that the Big Brand Advertisers...
  • Adsense: Yes your comments are spot on. I hate the possibility of fraud and hope I never get accused by accident. If someone hates you enough they...
  • Jonathan Salem Baskin: I absolutely agree with your post, and am continually fascinated (and somewhat befuddled) by marketers' willingness to...
  • George Michie: Dan, I hear you! Ultimately Google will choose the ad that generates the most revenue. That will depend largely on customer intent...
  • dan: I find geo-targeting an alarming trend. The power of the internet is that you can get information, products and services from around the...
  • Alan Rimm-Kaufman: Oliver -- yes, there's always a tradeoff between sales and profits. Picking that tradeoff is the most important strategic...
  • George: Good point, Christian, Yep, far be it from me to criticize the marketing plans of huge, profitable, growing firms. Ultimately there is "hit...

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 757
  • Words: 335,687
  • Comments: 1,326

Administration

Close
  • Social Web
  • E-mail
Powered by ShareThis