RKG Logo 434-978-4300

Assessing the correct value of your marketing channels — web, phone, catalog — takes some care. Ditto for assessing the correct value of your multi-channel buyers. Naive approaches can lead to wrong conclusions.

One oft-repeated mantra is multichannel buyers are worth more than single channel buyers. Perhaps yes, perhaps no — you need to determine this yourself for your own business.

Too often, folks reach the “multichannel buyers are good” conclusion by mishandling their data. By definition, multi-channel buyers have bought more than once. Multi-channel buyers are, by, definition, multibuyers, and thus more valuable.

Here’s an example. Consider a multi-channel retailer who has 1000 new buyers each month, with an average order of $100 for all orders (phone, web, 1st order, 2nd order), where customers are equally likely to buy by phone or web (50% web, 50% callcenter, regardless of 1st or 2nd order), and a 10% 12-month repeat purchase rate. In this scenario, web and phone orders (and buyers) are equally valuable in all respects. Here’s the spreadsheet, looking at a given one month cohort over their first year on file:

The 50 multichannel customers have average 12-month sales of $200 per customer, whereas the overall average customer has 12-month sales of $110. VoilĂ  — multichannel folks are 81% more valuable than average! (But they’re not, of course. In this toy model, they’re truly just as valuable as any two time buyer.)

Basic math? Yep. Such an obvious mistake that no retailers make this incorrect calculation? Nope.

Kevin Hillstrom over at MineThatData has an interesting whitepaper about doing these calculations correctly and introducing his new consulting business — worth a read.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

    No related posts.

No Comments Yet

Your comment will be first!

Your Comment

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2007/03/07/multichannel-buyers-are-multibuyers/trackback/

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • George Michie: Doesn’t have to be, it can be intra-adgroup as well.
  • Josh: George – I take it you’re referencing a scenario where your exact-match keywords are not listed as negative exact match keywords...
  • George Michie: Melissa, you’re right, it’s always happened to varying degrees, particularly since the advent of extended broad match....
  • Mel66: I don’t think this is a bug. It’s been happening for years. It *is* impossible to manage, and I can’t help but wonder if...
  • George Michie: Thanks Matt, Sometimes humor serves a purpose.
  • George Michie: Ken, sadly, as Jim stated above, too few people look under the hood and raise Cain. We’re very fortunate to have great reps on...
  • Matt: This is great! I started out reading this with the same anger that I feel everyday I spend unnecessary amounts of time optimizing to get...
  • Ken Truman: Right on, George. This is yet another one of the vagaries of broad matching that continues to drive smart advertisers mad. Your post...
  • George Michie: Interesting idea, Mark. The question might be: would advertisers know someone’s Twitter handle? Most require an email, but I...
  • @markthijssen: What if you would ask a consumer about his experience with the product some days/weeks/months after the sale via twitter. This might...
  • George Michie: Thanks Kenny, Another particularly annoying variation on the theme involves flashing the brand ads around on general searches. The...
  • Kenny: I’ve seen this happen too – very annoying, especially when the broad match ad that is served is specific to a particular...
  • George Michie: Jim, I think you’re right on that last piece. To me, Google doesn’t have to see this as either/or, by simply offering...
  • Jim Novo: I’ve also written about this “smart client” problem, the idea that a lot of what Google “suggests” or does...
  • Kathleen Raines: In my letter I did put the wrong month. I said April it should have been May.

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 948
  • Words: 451,089
  • Comments: 2,862

Administration