| Title: | Simpler Writing, Better Conversion? |
| URL: | http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2007/02/28/simpler-writing-better-conversion/ |
| Printed: | March 14, 2010 |
| Source: | The Rimm-Kaufman Group Blog, info@rimmkaufman.com |
- February 28, 2007
- 0 comments
Back in 1997, Jakob Neilsen described how web pages using simple and clear writing are more effective, enjoying significantly higher usability scores.
This still holds true today.
If you’re not familiar with Simple Wikipedia, check it out. Simple Wikipedia is version of Wikipedia – the encyclopedia based on a wiki that anyone can change — which uses simpler English.
Articles in the Simple English Wikipedia use fewer words and easier grammar than the original English Wikipedia. The Simple English Wikipedia is also for people with different needs, such as students, children, adults with learning difficulties and people who are trying to learn English. Other people use the Simple English Wikipedia because its simple language helps them to understand unfamiliar topics or complex ideas. — Simple English Wikipedia
Are any of your users non-native English speakers? Very young or very old? Adults with learning disabilities?
More likely: are your web visitors typical web users — that is, visitors in a rush, with little time and even less patience?
If so, clearer web copy might improve your web usability and conversion. Check out the writing style over at Simple Wikipedia.
If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.
Related Posts
- Clear writing is clear thinking All writing is "selling" copy -- whether you're pitching an actual product or arguing for your ideas. ...
- Robert Scott on Clear Writing Nice post from Denny Hatch citing Robert Scotton clear web writing: simpler words, shorter sentences, less fog....
- On Writing Effective Blog Post Titles Here are the top 30 RKG blog post titles to date....
- Leo Tolstoy and your website conversion rate Usable websites recognize that “pattern” does not equal “clone” or “cookie-cutter." ...
No Comments Yet
Your comment will be first!
Your Comment