RKG Logo 434-978-4300

Taking clear aim at Microsoft’s immense Office revenue stream, Google announced Google Apps Premier yesterday.

$50 per year for Gmail, Google Talk, Google Calendar, Docs & Spreadsheets, Page Creator, 10 gigs of storage, and service level agreement promising 99.9% uptime and 24/7 tech support.

And rumor has it a Google Outlook clone is coming soon.

The two obvious concerns are availability (no web access = no access to your documents; or, Google goes down = no access to your documents) and security (Google can see all your stuff; hackers who crack into Google can also see all your stuff). I think the second is a far greater concern than the first.

(Interesting pdf on recent Google exploit, in this case Desktop Search: check out Watchfire’s whitepaper, “Overtaking Google Desktop“).

The $50 price point for whole darn suite is certainly on the money for SOHO and small businesses. Office is clearly monopoly priced, and Outlook takes too much hassle to administer. SoftwareAsAService makes clear sense for many homes and businesses.

I don’t think large corporations are going to trust Google (or any outside hosted webapp) with all their spreadsheets and email, however. Wouldn’t there be Sarbanes-Oxley issues regarding sensitive financial data on publically traded firms?

The real killer app will be Google Apps running inside a corporate firewall, on a corporation’s own servers, regularly updated and patched and help-desked by Google, and all happily SarbOx compliant. I predict we’ll see that by year’s end.

Watch your back, MSFT.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

    No related posts.

No Comments Yet

Your comment will be first!

Your Comment

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2007/02/23/google-launches-googleapps/trackback/

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Mark Ballard: Cory, I don’t see this as an SEO v. PPC issue. The core of my argument is that CTRs are lower primarily due to misleading...
  • Cory Grassell: What are your thoughts on stats that suggest consumers are more apt to click on organic search results than PPC results? As a...
  • George Michie: Kevin, Marc, thanks for your comments. Help is coming, but not the solution. There are a number of instances when the CTR on the...
  • Marc Adelman: George, You have been an advocate of “the advanced control option” for years now. Depressing right YEARS! Eh…listen...
  • Kevin Hill: Is what they really need is a fourth match type. Here’s google’s help documentation on broad match: This is the default...
  • Kevin Micalizzi, Dimdim Web Conferencing: Jim (& George)- We still offer a free version of Dimdim. Just click Sign Up Now at the top of the...
  • Tomas: indeed, i can’t talk about it either… :)
  • Philip Price: Thank you for the RegHack, it worked for me, tho at first when i made the reg file with the information i copied from above i also...
  • George Michie: Sorry Jim, this post was written in 2007. Apparently some of those products are gone.
  • Jim: Hey, I checked two products like dimdim and cutepdf but none is free. What are you talking about free and open source?
  • George Michie: If they keep hearing the same message, and seeing evidence in the data to back it up, something will have to give. There is hope on...
  • Tomas: I’ve been having the same argument with Google for months now and in the end there does seem to be a feature in the algorithm that...
  • George Michie: Doesn’t have to be, it can be intra-adgroup as well.
  • Josh: George – I take it you’re referencing a scenario where your exact-match keywords are not listed as negative exact match keywords...
  • George Michie: Melissa, you’re right, it’s always happened to varying degrees, particularly since the advent of extended broad match....

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 948
  • Words: 451,089
  • Comments: 2,877

Administration