RKG Logo

Sam Ford, a fellow blogger from the Marketing 150, reached out to us about their new domain:

I wanted to quickly ask if you could change the URL for the Convergence Culture Consortium. We recently changed our URL to http://www.convergenceculture.org/weblog/, and I wanted it to be fixed on your list. Thanks!

No problem, done. (Good luck with the new domain, Sam!)

But there’s something wrong about this request — a site owner shouldn’t have to be reaching out to all of their inbound links to tell them about a change. Their server should be handing out 301 redirects to let visitors know of the new location.

As of this writing, both their dot-org and dot-net are serving pages — both http://www.convergenceculture.org/weblog/ and http://www.convergenceculture.net/weblog/ work.

Not only that, the non-www versions are also happily serving pages: http://convergenceculture.org/weblog/ and http://convergenceculture.net/weblog/ also work.

This laissez-faire domain configuration could harm rankings in search engines through duplicate content penalties. Yes, the search engines should be able to cannonicalize these domains, but you’re better off it doing it yourself by issuing hard redirects (301s) from the three “wrong” (www-net, no-www-net, no-www-org) domains over to the one “right” domain (www-org). Easy — takes just a few minutes tweaking the server config.

Properly handling URL structure changes (vs. just domain changes) takes more time and care.

For example, suppose you want your “jobs” page to move from “www.yourdomain.com/jobs” to “www.yourdomain.com/careers”. All fine and good. Just use a 301 redirect to tell visitors about the change. What you don’t want to occur is a broken link (the server sends a 404 “not found” to when asked for “/jobs”) or duplicate content (the server sends the same page to both requests).

The W3C instructs, “don’t change URLs”, but often that solution isn’t feasible. You can change URLs, but you need to do it carefully and keep the old forms working.

Consider every URL on your site a promise or a contract: a search engine can index that URL (unless you’ve no-indexed the page), a human can bookmark it, a scraper can rely on it, etc. When you migrate a site to a new URL architecture, make sure every old URL still works. Mishandling your old URLs is linkrot, which degrades both your site, your rankings, and the entire web.

Like with a domain change, the right way to handle URL changes is through 301 redirects, which tell visitors

“Hello! You were looking for a page at X, and now it lives at Y, and this change is permanent, so please update your records and next time come in directly to Y for it.”

Properly handling URL changes often isn’t as easy as a simple server tweak. Unless the new and old URLs differ by a common regular expression, it is likely you’ll have to create extensive explicit old-to-new URL mappings.

Inbound links are precious. Not only do they matter to search engines, but they reflect the interconnected relationships of pages and people and ideas on the web.

When reorganizing your site, don’t break the old links. Redirect visitors to the new URLs.

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.

Share this post (via email, Digg, Delicious, etc)

Similar Posts

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2007/02/20/site-reorgs-and-linkrot-dont-break-links/trackback/

No Comments Yet

Your comment will be first!

Your Comment

We "do-follow" links in comments. This may help your search rankings. Learn more...

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Rachel Harper: Dear Mr. Ullman, I worked for JCpenney for almost 18 years. In the past servely months they deceied to change my job disription....
  • Harry Joiner: GREAT question. Very thought provoking. I shall steal this.
  • IM: The presentation is just amazing!
  • Alan Rimm-Kaufman: Thanks for the thoughtful comment, Mark. Do feel free to drop off some of those free video soda machines at our offices any time...
  • Pay Per Click Journal: Honestly we never thought that social networking ads really worked - that is until we saw recent data. We are surprised but...
  • Mark Pilipczuk: Excellent article and definitely worth the time to read. A few other tidbits caught my eye: * There are 150 people working on...
  • Jeff Cornejo: Maybe the business is not in the social network, but in the services that spring up around the social network...which get acquired....
  • Tad Miller: Larry, I blogged about this a few weeks ago and the press I found from E-commerce people all seemed to indicate that the gas prices...
  • Matthew: Why not use Joomla? I mean its a CMS... Wordpress really isnt its more for blogging and even Joomla can do that.
  • Truck Accessories: I sincerely hope that not too much marketing effort goes into playing on the fears surrounding this energy crisis. Not only is...
  • mike: I work for a small software company in Colorado and we're going the solar route after hearing about Google. It's a fantastic idea and I'm...
  • Matthew: When we paid for ads, we only noticed about a 10% increase in traffic from them which almost broke even
  • Mark Pilipczuk: "Befuddled" is too kind. This is rubbish, and coming from a very skilled DR-focused company, it's incredibly disappointing and a...
  • George Michie: Mike, thanks so much for your insightful comments! Gayle, you're right there are more types than these. The spotlight I wanted to...
  • Gayle Dallaston: There are many more types of affiliates than the three you mention - although unfortunately they may be the most common of the...

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 715
  • Words: 312,021
  • Comments: 1,055

Administration

Close
  • Social Web
  • E-mail
Powered by ShareThis