RKG Logo 434-978-4300

Sam Ford, a fellow blogger from the Marketing 150, reached out to us about their new domain:

I wanted to quickly ask if you could change the URL for the Convergence Culture Consortium. We recently changed our URL to http://www.convergenceculture.org/weblog/, and I wanted it to be fixed on your list. Thanks!

No problem, done. (Good luck with the new domain, Sam!)

But there’s something wrong about this request — a site owner shouldn’t have to be reaching out to all of their inbound links to tell them about a change. Their server should be handing out 301 redirects to let visitors know of the new location.

As of this writing, both their dot-org and dot-net are serving pages — both http://www.convergenceculture.org/weblog/ and http://www.convergenceculture.net/weblog/ work.

Not only that, the non-www versions are also happily serving pages: http://convergenceculture.org/weblog/ and http://convergenceculture.net/weblog/ also work.

This laissez-faire domain configuration could harm rankings in search engines through duplicate content penalties. Yes, the search engines should be able to cannonicalize these domains, but you’re better off it doing it yourself by issuing hard redirects (301s) from the three “wrong” (www-net, no-www-net, no-www-org) domains over to the one “right” domain (www-org). Easy — takes just a few minutes tweaking the server config.

Properly handling URL structure changes (vs. just domain changes) takes more time and care.

For example, suppose you want your “jobs” page to move from “www.yourdomain.com/jobs” to “www.yourdomain.com/careers”. All fine and good. Just use a 301 redirect to tell visitors about the change. What you don’t want to occur is a broken link (the server sends a 404 “not found” to when asked for “/jobs”) or duplicate content (the server sends the same page to both requests).

The W3C instructs, “don’t change URLs”, but often that solution isn’t feasible. You can change URLs, but you need to do it carefully and keep the old forms working.

Consider every URL on your site a promise or a contract: a search engine can index that URL (unless you’ve no-indexed the page), a human can bookmark it, a scraper can rely on it, etc. When you migrate a site to a new URL architecture, make sure every old URL still works. Mishandling your old URLs is linkrot, which degrades both your site, your rankings, and the entire web.

Like with a domain change, the right way to handle URL changes is through 301 redirects, which tell visitors

“Hello! You were looking for a page at X, and now it lives at Y, and this change is permanent, so please update your records and next time come in directly to Y for it.”

Properly handling URL changes often isn’t as easy as a simple server tweak. Unless the new and old URLs differ by a common regular expression, it is likely you’ll have to create extensive explicit old-to-new URL mappings.

Inbound links are precious. Not only do they matter to search engines, but they reflect the interconnected relationships of pages and people and ideas on the web.

When reorganizing your site, don’t break the old links. Redirect visitors to the new URLs.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

    No related posts.

No Comments Yet

Your comment will be first!

Your Comment

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2007/02/20/site-reorgs-and-linkrot-dont-break-links/trackback/

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Mark Ballard: Cory, I don’t see this as an SEO v. PPC issue. The core of my argument is that CTRs are lower primarily due to misleading...
  • Cory Grassell: What are your thoughts on stats that suggest consumers are more apt to click on organic search results than PPC results? As a...
  • George Michie: Kevin, Marc, thanks for your comments. Help is coming, but not the solution. There are a number of instances when the CTR on the...
  • Marc Adelman: George, You have been an advocate of “the advanced control option” for years now. Depressing right YEARS! Eh…listen...
  • Kevin Hill: Is what they really need is a fourth match type. Here’s google’s help documentation on broad match: This is the default...
  • Kevin Micalizzi, Dimdim Web Conferencing: Jim (& George)- We still offer a free version of Dimdim. Just click Sign Up Now at the top of the...
  • Tomas: indeed, i can’t talk about it either… :)
  • Philip Price: Thank you for the RegHack, it worked for me, tho at first when i made the reg file with the information i copied from above i also...
  • George Michie: Sorry Jim, this post was written in 2007. Apparently some of those products are gone.
  • Jim: Hey, I checked two products like dimdim and cutepdf but none is free. What are you talking about free and open source?
  • George Michie: If they keep hearing the same message, and seeing evidence in the data to back it up, something will have to give. There is hope on...
  • Tomas: I’ve been having the same argument with Google for months now and in the end there does seem to be a feature in the algorithm that...
  • George Michie: Doesn’t have to be, it can be intra-adgroup as well.
  • Josh: George – I take it you’re referencing a scenario where your exact-match keywords are not listed as negative exact match keywords...
  • George Michie: Melissa, you’re right, it’s always happened to varying degrees, particularly since the advent of extended broad match....

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 948
  • Words: 451,089
  • Comments: 2,877

Administration