RKG Logo

Charles Fishman’s The WalMart Effect is highly recommended to anyone working in retail. Fishman’s no Wal-Mart fan, but neither is he a polemicist. His book is thoughtful and fair.

Some of the book’s facts are staggering in their scale. In scope, Wal-Mart is the Grand Canyon of retail:

* WalMarts US sales came to $2060 per every US Household in 2005 — and on that $2060,they earned $75.
* Each week, 100 million Americans shop at WalMart.
* From 1997 to 2004, the US added 670,000 new retail jobs. 480,000 of those — 70% — were at Wal-Mart. The remaining new net retail jobs — 190,000 across the nation for seven years — comes to 540 new retail jobs per state per year. While the rest of US retail grew at a 1.3% rate, Wal-Mart jobs grew at 67%.

Some stories about Wal-Mart’s legendary frugality:

* WalMart won’t pay to speak with vendors: vendors are required to provide Wal-Mart with a tollfree number, or accept collect calls. And Wal-Mart charges vendors for the overnight fees when sending over purchase orders.
* While traveling, Wal-Mart staff are only reimbursed up to 10% for tips.
* Wal-Mart staffers bring in office supplies from home to avoid requisitioning them.

Wal-Mart’s effects on the economy:

* Of the largest 10 suppliers to Wal-Mart in 1994, five subsequently went bankrupt or failed.
* Wal-Mart isn’t just Proctor and Gamble’s largest customer — they’re as big as P&G’s next nine customers combined.
* Bain’s Gib Carey estimated a clear correlation between doing business with Wal-Mart and profit margin: as companies increased the share of their business with Wal-Mart, their operating margins declined accordingly.

The chapter on the the $2.97 price for a gallon bottle of Vlasic pickles (a price point Wal-Mart held for two years) illustrates the effects of Wal-Mart’s monosopy, and how Wal-Mart distorts pricing signals:

That’s the scary part of the Vlasic story: the market didn’t create the $2.97 gallon of pickles, nor did waning consumer demand or a wild abundance of cucumbers. Wal-Mart created the $2.97 gallon jar of pickles. The price — a number that is a critical piece of information to buyers, sellers, and competitors about the state of the pickle market — the price was a lie. It was unrelated to either the supply of cucumbers or the demand for pickles. The price was a fiction imposed on the pickle market in Bentonville. Consumers saw a bargain; Vlasic saw no way out. Both were responding not to real market forces, but to a pickle price gimmick imposed by Wal-Mart as a way of making a statement. (p82)

I found Fishman’s conclusions about Wal-Marts’ motivations particularly insightful:

It is remarkable that almost of all of Wal-Mart’s behavior — even the bad behavior or the seemingly diabolical behavior — can be explained by taking Wal-Mart at their word. It really is all about “always low prices.” That’s a testament to the shaping power of that one idea, which Wal-Mart has turned into an obsession, almost a corporate fetish. (p.228)

The WalMart Effect: highly recommended.

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.

Share this post (via email, Digg, Delicious, etc)

Possibly Similar Posts

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2007/02/19/what-were-reading-the-walmart-effect-by-charles-fishman/trackback/

No Comments Yet

Your comment will be first!

Your Comment

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • George Michie: Thanks for your comments Ophir, you raise excellent points. Particularly as Geo-targeting competition in different areas moves...
  • SEO Services: Nice Post. Thanks for sharing this information with us.
  • Ophir Cohen: The Problem with Positions in SEM The whole concept of positions (1 vs 3 vs 15) has a lot of meaning when the goal of a campaign is...
  • George Michie: Thanks for your thoughts, Jason. I like your metaphor of the millions of query "channels". Indeed it may be that poor converting...
  • George Michie: Thanks Christian, I think they simply present those aggregate figures to highlight the difficulty: the data is incredibly sparse,...
  • Jason Anderson: Interesting Post. Seems likely that the same forces that produce a mix of regional and national advertising on television will...
  • Christian Little: Hey George, Regarding the university study, I read it over and I don't understand all the math, but I don't think it could be...
  • Elaine: Alan, Thanks for the Great post. As Eric mentioned, I'd love to see more on year-over-year analysis when you have it.
  • George Michie: Jonathan, thanks for your comment. I look forward to reading your book! Some Direct Marketers worry that the Big Brand Advertisers...
  • Adsense: Yes your comments are spot on. I hate the possibility of fraud and hope I never get accused by accident. If someone hates you enough they...
  • Jonathan Salem Baskin: I absolutely agree with your post, and am continually fascinated (and somewhat befuddled) by marketers' willingness to...
  • George Michie: Dan, I hear you! Ultimately Google will choose the ad that generates the most revenue. That will depend largely on customer intent...
  • dan: I find geo-targeting an alarming trend. The power of the internet is that you can get information, products and services from around the...
  • Alan Rimm-Kaufman: Oliver -- yes, there's always a tradeoff between sales and profits. Picking that tradeoff is the most important strategic...
  • George: Good point, Christian, Yep, far be it from me to criticize the marketing plans of huge, profitable, growing firms. Ultimately there is "hit...

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 757
  • Words: 335,687
  • Comments: 1,326

Administration

Close
  • Social Web
  • E-mail
Powered by ShareThis