RKG Logo 434-978-4300

First on an online retailing forum I follow, and later on the Shop.org blog, some online advertisers voiced concern late last week over their holiday 2006 pay-per-click campaigns: conversion down, costs up, traffic down. Other retailers chimed in to disagree — in their perspective, the PPC channel performed well: they enjoyed strong conversion and/or traffic and/or sales during Holiday ‘06.

Our data support the bullish perspective.

Across our clients, most experienced extremely strong Holiday results. On average, our clients enjoyed a 41% bump in sales per click after Thanksgiving. The largest holiday sales per click bump among our clients was an astounding 630%. Very happy holidays, indeed!

While 84% of our clients enjoyed SPC increases, 16% of our clients did not, experiencing flat or declining SPC rates. Digging into these cases, some were B2B clients selling business products with no year-end lift; others were B2C clients selling summer-season gear; and some were clients who opted to take a more aggressive position with their advertising during this period, generating more total revenue but albeit at intentionally lower SPCs.

holiday 2006 pay per click sales results

Looking back at similar sales-per-click holiday bump rates from ‘05 supports that 2006 was strong holiday for pay-per-click driven sales.

So, stating the obvious, our experience suggests the pay-per-click advertising channel performed well in terms of conversion for most advertisers during Holiday 2006.

Update: Another article on Holiday 2006 click quality here


Methodology: we used sales per click as a metric, tracking how this measure changed from the 30 days prior to Thanksgiving ‘06 to the 30 days after Thanksgiving ‘06. We included both paid search and comparison shopping engine feeds.


For example, suppose that in the 30 days prior to Thanksgiving, retailer “X” bought 500K clicks which generated $1 million in tracked resulting sales; and in the 30 days after, retailer “X” bought 750K clicks and generated $2.25 million in resulting sales. Sales rose from $2.00/click to $3.00/click, yielding a holiday SPC click of 3.00 / 2.00 - 1 = 50%. If this example was actual data, retailer “X” would be counted in the green “45% to 50%” bar.

A few notes on this analysis. First, we count each client equally in the histogram — we did not weight the data by clicks. We did this because our interest was in the fraction of advertisers who might be experienced lower SPCs during Holiday, regardless of size. Second, our choice of metric (sales per click) by definition considers only revenue, not cost or profit. Rest assured: high SPC bumps drove similarly happy bumps in profit. Third, these results pertain to our client base, and may or may not generalize to the entire web.

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

No Comments Yet

Your comment will be first!

Your Comment

Tags

RKG Tags:

Technorati Tags:

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2007/01/02/holiday-2006-sales-performance/trackback/

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Nancy Kast: I am writing about your billing and online services. I have been receiving calls saying my bill is not paid. My husband pays all our...
  • Marc Adelman: George, Thanks for sharing this data. From an online buzz perspective, Bing is making a big splash. Everyone is talking about it....
  • George Michie: Hi Dennis, I’m not a lawyer, so take anything I say on this with a grain of salt (and please don’t sue us if we’re...
  • survey online: unfortunatelly i have to say that Google tools are the easiest survey web
  • Dennis Yu: Alan, We’ve had several C&D’s sent to us for seemingly innocuous issues. One of our casual dining clients bid on a...
  • George Michie: Hi Vivek, Haven’t had time to put together a full update, but I did take a look at the numbers. No material gains in market...
  • Karridy: You should checkout ClickPath’s call to KW tracking.
  • Vivek: George, really enjoying reading about the analysis you guys do. Was wondering if you have an update on this given a couple more weeks have...
  • Vicki Swaim: Dear Mr.Ullman, I hope you can help me with my problem. I ordered a TV stand the end of April that was advertised as a close out item....
  • Luke: It’s a shame we live in such a litigious society. Why should we have to set up an association? Surely we can prevent senseless...
  • George Michie: Josh, we have had shots fired over our bow and our client’s in the past. Usually responsible companies are reasonable about...
  • Ryan: Ok, George, I’m sufficiently scared… Thanks… :-) Incidentally, are there any trademark resources (other than Google...
  • Josh: We have run into trademark issues for several clients, although it has so far been a matter of trying to make “fair use” of a...
  • Mike: THANK YOU! I love you man!! :)
  • Matthew: Francis, We’ve likewise seen the “A-List” phenomenon in the past. Perhaps with Bing.com, there won’t be anymore of...

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 871
  • Words: 392,916
  • Comments: 2,079

Administration