| Title: | Your “Off-Web Revenue Multiplier” |
| URL: | http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2006/12/18/your-off-web-revenue-multiplier/ |
| Printed: | October 7, 2008 |
| Source: | The Rimm-Kaufman Group Blog, info@rimmkaufman.com |
- December 18, 2006
- 2 comments
Thoughtful MCM article by Cam Balzer on quantifying the value of off-web conversions resulting from paid search:
In one survey, we polled the client’s online customers as well as an anonymous panel regarding their shopping and purchase behavior online and offline. From that information and purchase data we were able to determine that the client’s customer base exhibited an offline multiplier of $2.50: For every dollar in online sales generated by search, an additional $2.50 is generated offline.
This multiplier will vary by merchant, and can be considerably higher or lower. For example, the multiplier for storeless pure-plays like Amazon is, by definition, zero.
My instinct is that for most mechants, $2.50 is too high — I suspect $0.50 is more typical. Regardless, if you have stores, your multipler isn’t zero.
Surveys are one way to get at this number for your business, though there’s often material differences between what people report and what they actually do. Online coupons are another way, if the coupon can be scanned at the store register and later tracked without hassle. Cam didn’t discuss call centers, which also pull orders out of the offline channel. One powerful way to track call-center spillover is to have your call agents ask for a visible tracking code on the web page.
Estimating this multiplier correctly is important. Set it too low, and you leave opportunity on the table, ceding share to your competition. Set it too high, and you advertise recklessly, burning ad budget needlessly. However, when you see smart multi-channel competitors consistently outbidding you in search, it is time to wonder if they place more value on channel spillover than you do, and it may be time to put some serious effort into an accurate estimate of your off-web multiplier.
Update
After writing this, my colleague George Michie pointed out the importance of distinguishing research from shopping. A consumer moving towards a big-ticket considered purchase — say, an expensive piece of consumer electronics — will use the search engines heavily during the research phase. If later polled at point of purchase, many will report having used search to reach the retailer’s site prior to buying. A careful survey or well-designed coupon approach should distinguish between search visitors who come to your site just for research, versus those who come to buy and then opt to do so off-line.
If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.
Possibly Similar Posts
- Tips for Managing the Multichannel Maze
- SEM Pricing Models
- Interview: Yahoo’s Diane Rinaldo on Panama and Multichannel
- Effective Checkout Pages: “Voucher” vs. “Coupon” Language at CustomInk
- Demand channel vs. Transaction Channel
George makes a good point. While this isn’t the crux of the initial article, isn’t every purchase a considered purchase? I don’t beleive in this classification of purchases. Of course there are those that require more research but for multi-channel retailers, they should be focusing on incentives to their customers to make the Web site their point of purchase vs. their retail stores. Increase that metric and operations costs as well as overhead goes down. The old channel conflict game.
Good thought on shopping.