RKG Logo 434-978-4300

At an investor conference held this past Tuesday, Barry Diller of IAC Search & Media stated that Ask.com would focus on serving ads from syndicated partners.

Diller comments, “There are three players who seem to be anxious to talk to us about serving ads after ‘07″. Ask’s current relationship with Google expires at the end of 2007.

Yahoo and MSN must have their eye on Ask’s traffic, but at what price? I think Google would be willing to pay substantially to keep Ask as a Google Network member (like the Google /AOL alliance of late 2005).

Diller cited the importance of growing search volume to increase revenues. Ask is running TV ads to this end, promoting Ask as the search engine for humans.

So, just when it looked like Ask.com was dropping the idea of running on their own platform, IAC’s VP of Marketing, James Speer pulled a 180 today and called for “…building out a much more competitive platform on a lot of fronts.”

Huh? Which way is Ask headed?

To survive, Ask needs to grow their share before ‘08. When the Google contract expires, they need to present the growing value of their name, and ultimately capture a larger ticket.

My opinion: Ask.com should scrap its platform and continue to serving syndicated ads. Ask can not bear the cost of maintaining a world-class search ad platform on only 5% of search market revenues.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

    No related posts.

No Comments Yet

Your comment will be first!

Your Comment

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2006/09/22/askcoms-next-steps-to-platform-or-not-to-platform/trackback/

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • George Michie: Kevin, Marc, thanks for your comments. Help is coming, but not the solution. There are a number of instances when the CTR on the...
  • Marc Adelman: George, You have been an advocate of “the advanced control option” for years now. Depressing right YEARS! Eh…listen...
  • Kevin Hill: Is what they really need is a fourth match type. Here’s google’s help documentation on broad match: This is the default...
  • Kevin Micalizzi, Dimdim Web Conferencing: Jim (& George)- We still offer a free version of Dimdim. Just click Sign Up Now at the top of the...
  • Tomas: indeed, i can’t talk about it either… :)
  • Philip Price: Thank you for the RegHack, it worked for me, tho at first when i made the reg file with the information i copied from above i also...
  • George Michie: Sorry Jim, this post was written in 2007. Apparently some of those products are gone.
  • Jim: Hey, I checked two products like dimdim and cutepdf but none is free. What are you talking about free and open source?
  • George Michie: If they keep hearing the same message, and seeing evidence in the data to back it up, something will have to give. There is hope on...
  • Tomas: I’ve been having the same argument with Google for months now and in the end there does seem to be a feature in the algorithm that...
  • George Michie: Doesn’t have to be, it can be intra-adgroup as well.
  • Josh: George – I take it you’re referencing a scenario where your exact-match keywords are not listed as negative exact match keywords...
  • George Michie: Melissa, you’re right, it’s always happened to varying degrees, particularly since the advent of extended broad match....
  • Mel66: I don’t think this is a bug. It’s been happening for years. It *is* impossible to manage, and I can’t help but wonder if...
  • George Michie: Thanks Matt, Sometimes humor serves a purpose.

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 948
  • Words: 451,089
  • Comments: 2,874

Administration