RKG Logo 434-978-4300

The EFF put up interesting post on How To Keep Your Search History Private.

Regularly flush cookies? Takes too much time. Lose the advantages of logging in? Too inconvenient. No vanity searches? Come on — ego too large. : )

The sensible EFF recommendations are too complicated for the inexperienced web user and too inconvenient for the experienced user.

Only (1) ardent privacy heads and (2) reasonably smart badguys will take the time.
For the majority of us, our online search tracks will be logged in the database of intentions for just about forever…

Idle speculation: I wonder if Brin and Page follow the EFF’s advice?

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

    • Staying Private, II Could an increased interest/awareness of online privacy harm online advertisers by hampering their ability to track? No, I don't think so. ...
    • Protect Private Data With A Privacy Wall The folks over at Wesabe describe a neat idea for protecting private data in a database: they call it the "privacy wall."...

No Comments Yet

Your comment will be first!

Your Comment

Tags

RKG Tags: , , , ,

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2006/08/17/staying-private/trackback/

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Lance: George - Thanks so much for the interview and the kind words. Jake - We have seen the gains from our tests hold up. But I am sensitive to...
  • Andrew@BloggingGuide: I liked what he said: our approach is to never be satisfied, and always seek incremental improvement. This is absolutely true...
  • Jake Minturn: Great interview! One thing I am curious about, and I’d love to get Lance’s take on this, is if these boosts in conversion...
  • Bob: Would your call center stop answering sales calls because they’ve reached their budgeted labor for the month? This is considered...
  • David: Great post George, nice to see technology story telling alive. Kept me gripped and v interesting.
  • Rex Dixon: @George - That is too bad to hear. I don’t believe we have any PPC test results on our site currently.
  • George Michie: Ken, You’re absolutely right if the CR difference between A and B is small (2 or 3%) the odds of A running the table...
  • Ken Truman: Shay - I definitely think the same logic applies to day of week analysis. George - That’s an extremely interesting way of...
  • George Michie: Hi Laurence, We think folks spend far too much time worrying about mythical penalties. The account QS is dominated by the QS on your...
  • Laurence: Hi George, Thank you for the enlightening post. You’ve sold me on how important the long tail is so over the past few weeks...
  • Billy Wolt: take-away: Make sure you are bidding on your brand, broad topic, and specific model keywords :)
  • George Michie: Thanks for the kind words Lance and Bryan. Andy, I feel your pain. I meant to include a section on why site exclusions didn’t...
  • Algernon: Yay for yahoo! Just in time for them to shut it all down and hand the keys to Microsoft. Sorry, as an advertiser who got hammered for...
  • Bryan: Excellent post, George! Now lets cross our fingers that the folks at Microsoft give us the ability to adjust bids by syndication partner...
  • Lance: Brilliant post, George. Here’s hoping things pan out this way and everyone wins.

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 947
  • Words: 450,092
  • Comments: 2,843

Administration