RKG Logo 434-978-4300

Google beat Yahoo hands down by offering their paid search API to everyone.
An open API, available for anyone to use.

In contrast, the old Yahoo API — the Overture DTC-XML platform — was closed. Access was/is limited to major agencies and advertisers. Not sure whether the new Yahoo platform will be open to the public. I suspect it wont. (Need to go back and read our agency T&Cs carefully to see.)

The open Google AdWords API led to wide adoption and the creation of many tools.

This pushed AdWords use out to more advertisers, making the AdWords market even more efficient (read: higher CPCs, more revenue to Google). Even though users are now grumbling about the coming Adwords API fees, the open API approach was a Very Smart Idea for Google.

But I have mixed feelings about the recent AdSense API announcement / leak

If this new API provides good clicks to advertisers and provides crucial revenue to user generated content sites like YouTube and Facebook, well that is all well and good.

But my fear the API will allow AdSense spammers to do more damage more quickly. If made public, the automation enabled by an API could lower the quality of content traffic even more so, and lower it even more quickly. That’d turn out be a Very Dumb Idea for Google.

Google, don’t open up the AdSense API to the world. Restrict it to major solid user-gen content sites. Don’t let the spammers use it to automate their damage. The search community will thank you.

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

    No related posts.

Your Comment

Tags

RKG

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2006/05/30/adsense-api/trackback/

Blogs Citing This Post

  1. Pingback: AdWords vs. AdSense Click Fraud — Why Do So Few Get It? on December 20, 2007
  2. Pingback: CPAN: Praising Yahoo, Praising Open Markets on December 21, 2007

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • George Michie: Kevin, Marc, thanks for your comments. Help is coming, but not the solution. There are a number of instances when the CTR on the...
  • Marc Adelman: George, You have been an advocate of “the advanced control option” for years now. Depressing right YEARS! Eh…listen...
  • Kevin Hill: Is what they really need is a fourth match type. Here’s google’s help documentation on broad match: This is the default...
  • Kevin Micalizzi, Dimdim Web Conferencing: Jim (& George)- We still offer a free version of Dimdim. Just click Sign Up Now at the top of the...
  • Tomas: indeed, i can’t talk about it either… :)
  • Philip Price: Thank you for the RegHack, it worked for me, tho at first when i made the reg file with the information i copied from above i also...
  • George Michie: Sorry Jim, this post was written in 2007. Apparently some of those products are gone.
  • Jim: Hey, I checked two products like dimdim and cutepdf but none is free. What are you talking about free and open source?
  • George Michie: If they keep hearing the same message, and seeing evidence in the data to back it up, something will have to give. There is hope on...
  • Tomas: I’ve been having the same argument with Google for months now and in the end there does seem to be a feature in the algorithm that...
  • George Michie: Doesn’t have to be, it can be intra-adgroup as well.
  • Josh: George – I take it you’re referencing a scenario where your exact-match keywords are not listed as negative exact match keywords...
  • George Michie: Melissa, you’re right, it’s always happened to varying degrees, particularly since the advent of extended broad match....
  • Mel66: I don’t think this is a bug. It’s been happening for years. It *is* impossible to manage, and I can’t help but wonder if...
  • George Michie: Thanks Matt, Sometimes humor serves a purpose.

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 948
  • Words: 451,089
  • Comments: 2,875

Administration