RKG Logo 434-978-4300

The following is a letter to the editor of DM News

Why Search Rules Do Work

Congratulations to Ellen Siminoff on her article, “Why Search Rules Just Don’t Work” (DMNews, April 24, 2006). Ms. Siminoff correctly notes that search marketers can no longer manage their campaigns using simple rules or position-based bidding. However, I’d disagree with her recommendation to manage keywords as “a single portfolio.”

Retail is about real people and real products, and like all human endeavors is full of special cases. In my search agency, clients often instruct us to apply different economic goals to different classes of their ads, reflecting different marketing objectives within their total search effort. Some ads run for margin; others for sales, store traffic, or branding. Holding every ad in a portfolio to the same metric isn’t wise marketing.

We find our clients enjoy significant performance gains by layering rules-based marketing on top of our portfolio-based bidding platform. Rules-based portfolio marketing goes beyond simple term-position rules (“Keep the “widget’ ad in the top three slots.”) Rules-based portfolio marketing allows retailers to optimize the different objectives for different classes of ads.

As click costs rise, smart search marketers should seek out strong, statistically savvy bidding algorithms. Strong technology is essential, as Ms. Siminoff points out. Yet, as search becomes more complex and more clicks convert in call centers and retail stores, strong marketing skills become just as essential.

Winning at search in 2006 is both art and science.

Alan Rimm-Kaufman

If you like this post, consider subscribing to our RSS feed. You can also have new posts sent to you via email.


Related Posts

No Comments Yet

Your comment will be first!

Your Comment

Tags

RKG

Trackback

http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2006/05/01/letter-to-the-editor-why-search-rules-do-work/trackback/

Email Updates

Categories

Recent Comments

  • George Michie: Kevin, Marc, thanks for your comments. Help is coming, but not the solution. There are a number of instances when the CTR on the...
  • Marc Adelman: George, You have been an advocate of “the advanced control option” for years now. Depressing right YEARS! Eh…listen...
  • Kevin Hill: Is what they really need is a fourth match type. Here’s google’s help documentation on broad match: This is the default...
  • Kevin Micalizzi, Dimdim Web Conferencing: Jim (& George)- We still offer a free version of Dimdim. Just click Sign Up Now at the top of the...
  • Tomas: indeed, i can’t talk about it either… :)
  • Philip Price: Thank you for the RegHack, it worked for me, tho at first when i made the reg file with the information i copied from above i also...
  • George Michie: Sorry Jim, this post was written in 2007. Apparently some of those products are gone.
  • Jim: Hey, I checked two products like dimdim and cutepdf but none is free. What are you talking about free and open source?
  • George Michie: If they keep hearing the same message, and seeing evidence in the data to back it up, something will have to give. There is hope on...
  • Tomas: I’ve been having the same argument with Google for months now and in the end there does seem to be a feature in the algorithm that...
  • George Michie: Doesn’t have to be, it can be intra-adgroup as well.
  • Josh: George – I take it you’re referencing a scenario where your exact-match keywords are not listed as negative exact match keywords...
  • George Michie: Melissa, you’re right, it’s always happened to varying degrees, particularly since the advent of extended broad match....
  • Mel66: I don’t think this is a bug. It’s been happening for years. It *is* impossible to manage, and I can’t help but wonder if...
  • George Michie: Thanks Matt, Sometimes humor serves a purpose.

Blog Stats

  • Posts: 948
  • Words: 451,089
  • Comments: 2,874

Administration