Driving in this morning, three random stories on NPR caught my ear as having a paid search angle.
(I couldn't see how to link to the NPR audio directly. To hear these clips, click on the H2 links below, then click on "Listen Now" link. The text isn't the transcript of the audio, just background info.)
Renee Montagne asks Mario Armstrong, "How will Google make money from Chrome?" Armstrong suggests three answers:
- Browser as new OS.
- Monitoring user behavior to better target ads.
You missed the boat, NPR.
- There is no advertising in Chrome. Web pages themselves carry the ads. All browsers display all the same ads (unless ad blockers installed).
- Unlike Windows, Chrome is open source. Google is encouraging other browser teams to utilize their technology freely. Unlike Windows, Google doesn't directly benefit from having coded Chrome -- there is no lock-in.
- Chrome does not send detailed browsing info back to Google.
Here's how I'd answer Renee's question:
- Financial. Anything that makes web browsing easier leads to more web use. More web use leads to more Google clicks, on both search and content ads. More Google clicks leads to more Google revenue, profit, and market cap.
- Web Evangelism. Google deeply believes in the transformative power of the internet. Anything that makes web browsing faster and safer is Inherently Good.
The Fed grabs control of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, and 30 year mortgage rates plummet 30+ basis points overnight. Wow.
What's the paid search angle? For PPC advertisers, the conversion value of traffic on terms like 30 year mortgage likely just changed significantly, and it did so extremely quickly.
Statistical bidding systems use historical trends to predict what will happen next. The underlying assumption is that world is changing slowly, so the near future will resemble the near past. When the world is changing fast, extrapolations can miss the mark.
'Bots handle the mind-numbing large-scale mechanics of tactical PPC infinitely better than humans. But smart people can react quicker to external strategic shifts than robots.
We've been auditing search financials for prospective clients now for years. Amazing, but even in 2008 we still see retailers overshooting or undershooting their key selling seasons (holiday, spring, back-to-school, whatever) by ceding too much control to the machines.
No, not really. Not this week, at least. But that's what a small bond research shop in Florida believed when it misread the date on a stale Chicago Trib story about UAL's bankruptcy from six years ago.
Hey, if you find it on Google, it has to be true, right?
Income Security Advisors pushed the "news" onto Bloomberg, and UAL promptly lost 99% of its value until trading was halted and the rumor corrected.
Yet another example of the terrifying speed of the web, and the implied authority conferred by top spot on a Google SERP.